《GRE写作：分类解析.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE写作：分类解析.doc（11页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、GRE写作：分类解析 今天给大家带来GRE写作分类解析，希望能够帮助到大家取得更好的成绩，下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。GRE写作：分类解析准备时，最重要的一个步骤在于熟悉题库和认真准备提纲。对于立论文(Issue)而言，自己动手拟一份完整的提纲是很有必要的，当然可以参考各种资料，但必须勤动脑，想一想提纲的逻辑连续性。实际上，有偏向性、但又不要绝对化的思路才是最易上手的。对于驳论文(Argument)而言，熟悉题库更为重要。很多人觉得一个题目拿过来随便就能挑出五六个错误。正常情况下是这样的，但的确有些难题若不事先好好准备，五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时，我正是因为在准备时放
2、掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目，而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目，所以写得很不好。虽然逻辑作文满分只有6分，可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说，它是GRE作文的精华因为GRE考试的就是逻辑，用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已，主要目的就是考察你的逻辑分析水平。写驳论文有很多小窍门，如需要锻炼出区别“事实”和“观点”的能力，不论题目中所给的事实有多夸张都需认为它是对的，不能攻击，只能攻击观点中的逻辑漏洞;凡是跟统计数字、统计方法有关的逻辑错误都尽量不要攻击，最多只能一笔带过等等。GRE写作满分范文赏析Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?
3、the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.?Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-
4、on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).?Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.?The?notion?that?protective?gear?reduces?the?injuries?s
5、uffered?in?accidents?seems?at?first?glance?to?be?an?obvious?conclusion.?After?all,?it?is?the?intent?of?these?products?to?either?provent?accidents?from?occuring?in?the?first?place?or?to?reduce?the?injuries?suffered?by?the?wearer?should?an?accident?occur.?However,?the?conclusion?that?investing?in?high
6、?quality?protective?gear?greatly?reduces?the?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident?may?mask?other?(and?potentially?more?significant)?causes?of?injuries?and?may?inspire?people?to?over?invest?financially?and?psychologically?in?protective?gear.?First?of?all,?as?mentioned?in?the?argument,?there?
7、are?two?distinct?kinds?of?gear?-?preventative?gear?(such?as?light?reflecting?material)?and?protective?gear?(such?as?helmets).?Preventative?gear?is?intended?to?warn?others,?presumably?for?the?most?part?motorists,?of?the?presence?of?the?roller?skater.?It?works?only?if?the?other?is?a?responsible?and?ca
8、ring?individual?who?will?afford?the?skater?the?necessary?space?and?attention.?Protective?gear?is?intended?to?reduce?the?effect?of?any?accident,?whether?it?is?caused?by?an?other,?the?skater?or?some?force?of?nature.?Protective?gear?does?little,?if?anything,?to?prevent?accidents?but?is?presumed?to?redu
9、ce?the?injuries?that?occur?in?an?accident.?The?statistics?on?injuries?suffered?by?skaters?would?be?more?interesting?if?the?skaters?were?grouped?into?those?wearing?no?gear?at?all,?those?wearing?protective?gear?only,?those?wearing?preventative?gear?only?and?those?wearing?both.?These?statistics?could?p
10、rovide?skaters?with?a?clearer?understanding?of?which?kinds?of?gear?are?more?beneficial.?The?argument?above?is?weakened?by?the?fact?that?it?does?not?take?into?account?the?inherent?differences?between?skaters?who?wear?gear?and?those?who?do?not.?If?is?at?least?likely?that?those?who?wear?gear?may?be?gen
11、erally?more?responsible?and/or?safety?conscious?individuals.?The?skaters?who?wear?gear?may?be?less?likely?to?cause?accidents?through?careless?or?dangerous?behavior.?It?may,?in?fact,?be?their?natural?caution?and?repsonsibility?that?keeps?them?out?of?the?emergency?room?rather?than?the?gear?itself.?Als
12、o,?the?statistic?above?is?based?entirely?on?those?who?are?skating?in?streets?and?parking?lots?which?are?relatively?dangerous?places?to?skate?in?the?first?place.?People?who?are?generally?more?safety?conscious?(and?therefore?more?likely?to?wear?gear)?may?choose?to?skate?in?safer?areas?such?as?parks?or
13、?back?yards.?The?statistic?also?goes?not?differentiate?between?severity?of?injuries.?The?conclusion?that?safety?gear?prevents?severe?injuries?suggests?that?it?is?presumed?that?people?come?to?the?emergency?room?only?with?severe?injuries.?This?is?certainly?not?the?case.?Also,?given?that?skating?is?a?r
14、ecreational?activity?that?may?be?primarily?engaged?in?during?evenings?and?weekends?(when?doctors?offices?are?closed),?skater?with?less?severe?injuries?may?be?especially?likely?to?come?to?the?emergency?room?for?treatment.?Finally,?there?is?absolutely?no?evidence?provided?that?high?quality?(and?presum
15、ably?more?expensive)?gear?is?any?more?beneficial?than?other?kinds?of?gear.?For?example,?a?simple?white?t-shirt?may?provide?the?same?preventative?benefit?as?a?higher?quality,?more?expensive,?shirt?designed?only?for?skating.?Before?skaters?are?encouraged?to?invest?heavily?in?gear,?a?more?complete?unde
16、rstanding?of?the?benefit?provided?by?individual?pieces?of?gear?would?be?helpful.The?argument?for?safety?gear?based?on?emergency?room?statistics?could?provide?important?information?and?potentially?saves?lives.?Before?conclusions?about?the?amount?and?kinds?of?investments?that?should?be?made?in?gear?ar
17、e?reached,?however,?a?more?complete?understanding?of?the?benefits?are?needed.?After?all,?a?false?confidence?in?ineffective?gear?could?be?just?as?dangerous?as?no?gear?at?all.?Commentary?This?outstanding?response?demonstrates?the?writers?insightful?analytical?skills.?The?introduction,?which?notes?that
18、?adopting?the?topics?fallacious?reasoning?could?.?爄nspire?people?to?over?invest?financially?and?psychologically?in?protective?gear,?is?followed?by?a?comprehensive?examination?of?each?of?the?arguments?root?flaws.?Specifically,?the?writer?exposes?several?points?that?undermine?the?argument:?-?that?prev
19、entive?and?protective?gear?are?not?the?same?-?that?skaters?who?wear?gear?may?be?less?prone?to?accidents?because?they?are,?by?nature,?more?responsible?and?cautious?-?that?the?statistics?do?not?differentiate?by?the?severity?of?the?injuries?-?that?gear?may?not?need?to?be?high-quality?to?be?beneficial?T
20、he?discussion?is?smoothly?and?logically?organized,?and?each?point?is?thoroughly?and?cogently?developed.?In?addition,?the?writing?is?succinct,?economical,?and?generally?error-free.?Sentences?are?varied?and?complex,?and?diction?is?expressive?and?precise.?In?sum,?this?response?exemplifies?the?very?top?
21、of?the?6?range?described?in?the?scoring?guide.?If?the?writer?had?been?less?eloquent?or?provided?fewer?reasons?to?refute?the?argument,?the?paper?could?still?have?received?a?6.?GRE写作满分范文赏析Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need
22、?for?more?protective?equipment.?Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).?Clearly,?these?stati
23、stics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.?The?argument?presented?is?limited?but?useful.?It?indicates?a?possible?relationship?between?a?high?percentage?of?accidents
24、?and?a?lack?of?protective?equipment.?The?statistics?cited?compel?a?further?investigation?of?the?usefulness?of?protective?gear?in?preventing?or?mitigating?roller-skating?related?injuries.?However,?the?conclusion?that?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment?would?greatly?reduce.risk?of?being?severely
25、?injured?is?premature.?Data?is?lacking?with?reference?to?the?total?population?of?skaters?and?the?relative?levels?of?experience,?skill?and?physical?coordination?of?that?population.?It?is?entirely?possible?that?further?research?would?indicate?that?most?serious?injury?is averted?by?the?skaters?ability?
26、to?react?quickly?and?skillfully?in?emergency?situations.?Another?area?of?investigation?necessary?before?conclusions?can?be?reached?is?identification?of?the?types?of?injuries?that?occur?and?the?various?causes?of?those?injuries.?The?article?fails?to?identify?the?most?prevalent?types?of?roller-skating?
27、related?injuries.?It?also?fails?to?correlate?the?absence?of?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment?to?those?injuries.?For?example,?if?the?majority?of?injuries?are?skin?abrasions?and?closed-head?injuries,?then?a?case?can?be?made?for?the?usefulness?of?protective?clothing?mentioned.?Likewise,?if?inju
28、ries?are?caused?by?collision?with?vehicles?(e.g.?bicycles,?cars)?or?pedestrians,?then?light-reflective?equipment?might?mitigate?the?occurences.?However,?if?the?primary?types?of?injuries?are?soft-tissue?injuries?such?as?torn?ligaments?and?muscles,?back?injuries?and?the?like,?then?a?greater?case?could
29、?be?made?for?training?and?experience?as?preventative?measures.?Commentary?This?strong?response?gets?right?to?the?work?of?critiquing?the?argument,?observing?that?it?indicates?a?possible?relationship?but?that?its?conclusion?is?premature.?It?raises?three?central?questions?that,?if?answered,?might?under
30、mine?the?soundness?of?the?argument:?-?What?are?the?characteristics?of?the?total?population?of?skaters?-?What?is?the?usefulness?of?protective?or?reflective?gear?in?preventing?or?mitigating?rollerskating-related?injuries?-?What?are?the?types?of?injuries?sustained?and?their?causes?The?writer?develops?e
31、ach?of?these?questions?by?considering?possible?answers?that?would?either?strengthen?or?weaken?the?argument.?The?paper?does?not?analyze?the?argument?as?insightfully?or?develop?the?critique?as?fully?as?required?for?a?6?paper,?but?the?clear?organization,?strong?control?of?language,?and?substantial?degree?of?development?warrant?more?than?a?score?of?4.?GRE写作：分类解析
