《GRE写作：满分经验.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE写作：满分经验.doc（8页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、GRE写作：满分经验 如何在GRE写作中拿到满分呢？今天给大家带来GRE写作满分经验，希望能够帮助到大家，下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。GRE写作：满分经验决定考G本来就是一时冲动的结果，因为对于我来说要付出巨大的时间成本，并且接受短期内得不到任何实际的收益这一事实。然而，当我看到很多同学纷纷加入到考G行列中，自己也鼓足勇气参加了，就算是为了一个梦，为了自己的将来能有多一点的选择，能够为机会多做尝试。备考的过程我并没有经历太多的辛酸和劳苦，我很佩服一些学院的同学要在期末顶着论文、实验、期末考试等种种压力复习备考，我的大量时间大概和大多数人一样花在了单词上。红宝书翻过几遍已经不记得了，也翻过b
2、arrons list(但事实证明效果并不好)。至于说技巧或者经验，在这里我也只能谈一谈我对这个考试的一点感受，希望能给其他同学一点启发。作文：不要轻视argument能拿满分对于我来说很意外。关于字数，当时我的情况大概是：“issue500+”，“argument600+”也许大家都在奇怪为什么我argument能写的比issue多，其实我想告诉大家不要看轻argument，不要因为它容易就倾向性的少付出努力，不要忘记评分的时候两部分的权重是一样的。argument的模版大家应该见过很多，但在这里我想说的是既不要完全套用模版，因为这样会有雷同的危险，也不鼓励在*结构上过分的创新，可以参考模版
3、提供的结构。写作时不要让人感觉你是在“码字儿”，*的思想和逻辑性永远是最重要的，也是拿高分的关键。所以在开头和结尾的评价总结性语句中，你要注意和你在正文中的分析是否匹配，所谓匹配不在于用几个专业定性的词汇，而是要在细节上完美对应。当然把握这一点并不容易，因为涉及到用词和表达能力，在这一点上就要看你个人的水平了，词不在于华丽，而是要准确并且前后一致，并且尽量减少重复。Issue也是一样，我一直觉得要“意在笔先”，作文最重要的是你要有话可说，这就是为什么在字数上争论没有意义了，你的观点立意一般，你又没有太多的话可说，字数自然上不去，随意的拼凑不见得能拿高分。关于issue还有一点要说，就是宁愿往深
4、里写也不要扩大范围的泛泛而谈。我写的题目是关于英雄反映了一个社会的价值观的，整篇*我只引用了MichaelJordan这一个例子，当然在选例子的时候也要有讲究。我看到很多人花很多时间和精力搜集素材，写*的时候喜欢方方面面地进行列举，我不大赞同这样的做法，因为如果例子不是你熟悉的，引用起来也只能停留在浅层次，而没有深度。语文：多做新题目能拿到600分，完全靠的是我阅读的功底，还有一点运气，因为这次阅读相对简单。考试当天没能够跨区对我来说损失很大，很多题目就是一念之差。所以在这里要提醒大家珍惜做新题目的新鲜感，而不要把过多的时间花在反复看已经解决好了的老题目上。这次G6的类反比并不难，既没有偏词怪
5、词，也没有考什么特别的逻辑关系，但是从题目到题支都很少有和过去题目重复的地方。这就是为什么要大家这样做的原因。GRE写作满分范文赏析In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives.?In?todays?society,?there?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists.?I?will?disc
6、uss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field,?education,?and?the?work?place.?First,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field.?A?generalist?in?this?area?would?be?straight?foward?with?clients.?For?instance,?in?explaining?to?a?patient?they?had?cancer.?A?sp
7、ecialist?would?use?wording?that?you?would?believe?everything?is?fine.?Second,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?education?field.?In?this?field?some?instructors?use?big?words?and?try?to?out?smart?themselves?with?there?own?thoughts?of?character.?Last,?I?will?discuss?how?there?i
8、s?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?workplace.?In?the?workplace?the?bosses?should?be?open?with?personell.?For?instance,?instead?of?acting?like?they?know?everything?they?should?be?open?to?knew?thoughts?and?ideas.?COMMENTARYOn?the?surface,?this?essay?appears?to?present?an?organized?discussion?of?the?issue
9、.?In?actuality,?there?are?fundamental?deficiencies?in?analysis?and?development.?The?essay?begins?with?a?tautology:?.there?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists.?Then,?in?the?three?short?paragraphs?that?follow,?the?writer?promises?to?discuss?a?need?for?generalists?in?a?s
10、pecific?field,?but?none?of?these?discussions?materialize.?The?rest?of?the?essay?only?confirms?the?sense?of?fundamental?deficiency.?Rather?than?analyze?the?issue,?the?writer?unpersuasively?vilifies?specialists?as?people?who?use?their?power?to?deceive?and?mislead?others.?Although?the?errors?(sentence?
11、fragments,?incorrect?verb?tenses,?and?awkward?syntax)?are?persistent,?language?problems?alone?do?not?earn?this?essay?a?score?of?1.?Rather,?this?response?fits?the?scoring?guide?criterion?of?showing?little?evidence?of?the?ability?to?develop?or?organize?a?coherent?response?to?the?topic.?GRE写作满分范文赏析In?o
12、ur?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives.?I?disagree?with?the?portion?of?the?Specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?overated?statement.?Specialists?are?persons?who?take?care?of?certain?tasks?or?a?specific?area?of?whateve
13、r?the?case?may?be.?These?persons?contibute?more?time?and?effort?than?those?with?general?titles.?the?specialists?are?the?ones?who?can?tell?or?give?the?client?more?details?on?what?is?happening?to?them.?The?generalist?can?only?give?broad?ideas?which?can?be?a?number?of?things.?The?specialist?narrows?the
14、?ideas?down?to?the?specifics.?For?example?if?one?goes?to?a?general?practioner?doctor?for?pains?in?the?chest?area,?he?would?tell?the?client?that?the?poblem?may?be?heart?burns,?or?something?else?thats?not?be?so?serious,?depending?on?the?symptoms.?He?may?also?refer?him?to?a?cardiologist?to?be?sure?its?
15、not?any?thing?else.?The?point?Im?making?is?that?specialist?are?people?who?can?help?us?out?even?more?that?our?generalist.?Also?the?fact?that?one?would?go?to?a?specialist?only?in?dire?needs.?COMMENTARY?The?response?presents?a?position?on?the?issue?but?the?development?of?that?position?is?seriously?flaw
16、ed.?The?writer?begins?by?disagreeing?with?the?assertion?that?specialists.are?highly?over-rated?and?then?attempts?to?define?and?contrast?specialists?and?generalists.?The?attempt?is?unsuccessful,?partly?because?the?descriptions?are?vague?and?ill-conceived.?Whereas?the?example?of?going?to?a?general?pra
17、ctitioner?doctor?is?certainly?relevant,?the?writers?claim?that?a?general?practitioner?would?tell?a?patient?with?chest?pains?that?the?problem?may?be?heart?burns?or?something?else?thats?not?so?serious?seems?far-fetched.?The?response?is?further?weakened?by?poor?word?choice?and?by?numerous?errors?in?sentence?structure,?usage,?and?grammar.?These?problems,?while?not?severe?enough?to?seriously?interfere?with?meaning,?contribute?to?the?overall?rating?of?2.?GRE写作：满分经验
