微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt

上传人:文库蛋蛋多 文档编号:2345578 上传时间:2023-02-14 格式:PPT 页数:36 大小:3.89MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt_第1页
第1页 / 共36页
微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt_第2页
第2页 / 共36页
微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt_第3页
第3页 / 共36页
微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt_第4页
第4页 / 共36页
微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt_第5页
第5页 / 共36页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《微创与开放手术治疗III度腰椎滑脱症.ppt(36页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。

1、,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,历史沿革,来自希腊语:spondylo(椎体)和Listhesis(滑移)集合而成。1782年 Herbinlaux最先描述了腰5椎体前滑脱病例。1854年 Kilian首先定义脊柱滑脱症(spondylisthesis):“一椎体在另一椎体上部分或完全的滑移”。1957年 Taillard将脊柱滑脱症定义为“由于关节突间连续断裂或延长而引起椎体与其椎弓根、横突和上关节突一同向前滑移。”,流行性病学,Fredrickson BE,et al.The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthes

2、is.J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984,500 participants,Jacobsen s Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis:An Epidemiological Perspective.spine.2007,4151 participants,M:1533、F:2618 254cases(11.1%),M(1.5%):F(5.9%),M(0.7%):F(1.2%),Kalichman L,Kinm DH,Li L,etal.Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis.Prevalence and As

3、sociation With Low Back Pain in the Adult Community-Based Population.spine.2009,3529 participants,CT:11.5%,腰椎滑脱的Wiltse分型,Wiltse LL,Newman PH,MacNab I.Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.Clin Orthop,1976,117:23-29.,腰椎滑脱程度(Meyerding分型,1932),Meyerding HW.Spondylolisthesis:surgical tre

4、atment and resultsJ.Surg Gynecol Obstet,1932,54:371-37,I,II,III,IV,V,症状,马尾综合症,滑脱进展,Labelle H,Mac-Thiong JM,Roussouly P.Spino-pelvic sagittal balance of spondylolisthesis:a review and classication Eur Spine J,2011,滑脱进展,申勇.中国矫形外科杂志,2005,40y,43y,45y,滑脱进展,滑脱进展主要因素,PIBMIAngle of lordosisBilateral pars de

5、fects,Jacobsen s.spine.2007,Labelle H,Eur Spine J,2011Beutler WJ,Spine,2003,PI,手术治疗指征,持续或反复发作的腰腿痛、间歇性跛行,严重影响日常生活,经合理的非手术治疗(3个月或 3个月以上)无效者;神经功能障碍进行性加重者;出现大小便功能异常者,手术与非手术治疗,2-4年随访,LDS手术疗效优于非手术,开放性手术,开放手术,优点学习曲线短显露充分、视野大,缺点椎旁肌肉损伤多住院时间长出血多创伤大风险高,微创手术,微创手术,优点创伤小住院时间短出血小术后疼痛轻康复快并发症少,缺点学习曲线长,难掌握对手术者技术要求高,手

6、术难度大要求手术者有良好的三维解剖知识需要专用器械,增加手术成本暴露不充分,视野小,微创 VS 开放:腰椎滑脱?,Open,Mini,Who is best?,(PLIF)微创 VS 开放:长期疗效,(PLIF)微创 VS 开放:长期疗效,(TLIF)微创 VS 开放:疗效,Conclusion:Minimally invasive surgery(TLIF)for severe SDS(I-II grade)leads to adequate and safe decompression of lumbar stenosis and results in a faster recovery

7、of symptoms and disability in the early postoperative period.,(PLF)微创 VS 开放:疗效,Conclusion:The MIS-PLF utilizing a percutaneous pedicle screw system had less invasive,less postoperative pain,rapid improvement of several functional parameters compared to conventional open-PLF.This superiority in the M

8、IS-PLF group was maintained until 2 years postoperatively,suggesting that less invasive PLF offers better mid-term results in terms of reducing low back pain and improving patients functional capacity of daily living.,(PLF)微创 VS 开放:疗效,(ALIF+TLIF)微创 VS 开放:并发症,Conclusion:MIS(ALIF+TLIF)had less blood l

9、oss,less need for transfusion in the perioperative period,and a shorter hospital stay than open(ALIF+TLIF),but the length of surgery,intraoperative uoroscopy time,malpositioned instrumentation on postoperative imaging,and postoperative complications,including pulmonary embolus and surgical site infe

10、ction no difference.,(P/TLIF)微创 VS 开放:感染率,Conclusions:In this multihospital study,the MI technique(P/TLIF)was associated with a decreased incidence of perioperative SSI(27 4.6%vs 150 7.0%,p=0.037)in 2-level fusion.There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSIs(38 4.5%vs 77 4.8%,p=0.77)

11、between the open and MI cohorts for 1-level fusion procedures.,(PLIF)微创 VS 开放:多裂肌损伤,微创 VS 开放:多裂肌损伤,微创 VS 开放:费效分析,CONCLUSIONS:MIS TLIF resulted in reduced operative blood loss,hospital stay and 2-year cost,and accelerated return to work.Surgical morbidity,hospital readmission,and short-and long-term

12、clinical effectiveness were similar between MIS and open TLIF.MIS TLIF may represent a valuable and cost-saving advancement from a societal and hospital perspective.,微创 VS 开放:住院时间短、费用少,(TLIF)微创 VS 开放:Meta分析,Mini-TLIF VS mini-ALIF:疗效,Mini-TLIF VS mini-ALIF:疗效,MALIF,MTLIF,Mini-TLIF VS mini-ALIF:疗效,Con

13、clusions:Considering the clinical and radiological outcomes in both groups,the authors recommend that instrumented mini-TLIF is preferable at the L45 level,whereas instrumented mini-ALIF might be preferable at the L5S1 level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis.,正确掌握腰椎滑脱的治疗原则(侯树勋),不是所有的腰椎滑脱都需要治疗伴有腰痛的腰椎滑脱并非都需要手术根据滑脱的严重程度选择适当的手术方式 滑脱椎体的融合是手术治疗的最终目的,Thanks for your attention,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 建筑/施工/环境 > 项目建议


备案号:宁ICP备20000045号-2

经营许可证:宁B2-20210002

宁公网安备 64010402000987号