《Network of relationships questionnaire manual.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Network of relationships questionnaire manual.doc（28页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、Network of Relationships Questionnaire Manual By Wyndol Furman and Duane BuhrmesterThe University of Denver and the University of Texas at DallasOverview. We developed the Network of Relationships Inventory (NRI) to be able to examine a broad array of relationship characteristics across a number of
2、different types of personal relationships (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985). The most important feature of the NRI is that participants use the same set of items to describe their relationship with each of several members of their social network (e.g., mother, father, sibling, friend, romantic partner, an
3、d teacher.). This feature results in a matrix of “relationships by qualities” scores that is useful both for describing average (mean-level) differences among different types of relationships and for describing each type of relationship in terms of a profile of qualities. The matrix of scores has al
4、so proven useful in measuring of individual differences in relationship qualities, allowing researchers to examine the similarities and differences among various relationships and to evaluate how individual differences in relationships qualities are associated with other individual outcomes (e.g., l
5、oneliness, depression) and relationship outcomes (e.g., stability of relationships). Versions of the NRI.To date, three different versions of the NRI have been developed by Furman and Buhrmester (see Table 1). The original version of the NRIhere referred to as the NRI-Social Provisions Version (NRI-
6、SPV)drew on Robert Weiss (1974) and Harry Stack Sullivans (1953) conceptualization of social needs and social provisions (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985). A slightly revised version of the NRI-SPV has respondents rate the extent to which different network members satisfy each of seven social needs (affec
7、tion, reliable alliance, enhancement of worth, intimacy, instrumental help, companionship, and nurturance of other), two negative characteristics of relationships (conflict and antagonism). (The original SPV version also included a satisfaction scale; it was deleted in the revised version as it is n
8、ot a social provision. The antagonism scale was also substituted for a punishment scale in the original version so that the measure could be applied more broadly.). The NRI-SPV revised is the most widely used version of the NRI and it has proven especially useful for making developmental and cross-c
9、ultural comparisons in the roles that different network members play in satisfying different social needs.Table 1Versions of the NRIAll NRI ScalesSPVBSVRQVPositive QualitiesCompanionshipXXXIntimate DisclosureXXInstrumental AidXNurturanceXReassurance of WorthXReliable AllianceXAffectionXSeek Safe Hav
10、enXSeek Secure BaseXProvide Safe HavenXProvide Secure BaseXEmotional SupportXApprovalXSatisfactionXNegative QualitiesConflict/QuarrelingXXXAntagonismXXCriticismXXPressureXDominanceXExclusionXOther QualitiesRelative PowerXA second versionreferred to as the NRI- Behavioral Systems Version (NRI-BSV) is
11、 based on Furman and Wehners (1994) behavioral systems conceptualization of romantic and other close relationships. Based on an integration of attachment theory (Ainsworth, 1989; Shaver & Hazan, 1988) and Sullivanian theory (Sullivan, 1953), they hypothesized that the attachment, caregiving, affilia
12、tive, and sexual/reproductive behavioral systems become central in romantic relationships; the first three systems were expected to be key in other close types of relationships, although the degree to which a particular system is activated in a relationship varies by the type of relationship. The NR
13、I-BSV was designed to assess the extent to which adolescents dyadic relationships with romantic partners, friends, and parents are each characterized by behaviors commonly associated with the activation of the first three behavioral systems. This version of the NRI is especially useful for researche
14、rs interested in examining attachment, caregiving, and affiliative processes.A third versionreferred to as the NRI-Relationship Qualities Version (NRI-RQV)employs a more eclectic set of relationship qualities to describe the supportive and discordant qualities of relationships among children, adoles
15、cents, and adults (Buhrmester & Furman, 2008). This version was primarily developed to broaden the assessment of negative relationship feature (criticism, dominance, exclusion, pressure, and conflict), but it also added positive dimensions (emotional support and approval). The relationship features
16、it assesses are more behavioral and observable in nature (as opposed to attitudinal) and are rated on a “how often” frequency scale rather than a “how much” magnitude scale. As such, the scales are easily adapted for observer ratings and third-party informant ratings. The NRI-RQV included with this
17、manual is formatted in a space-saving “matrix” format that is appropriate for participants age 11 years and older. We include an option on each version for an extra person, such as a step-parent, grandparent, or teacher. You may also choose to select different relationships than those usually listed
18、. Simply add or delete the type of relationship on the Background page and throughout the questionnaire. Validity and Reliability. We have published two papers that explicitly address the validity and reliability of selected scales (Furman, W. 1996 The measurement of children and adolescents percept
19、ions of friendships: Conceptual and methodological issues. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendships in childhood and adolescence (pp. 41-65), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; Furman, W. & Buhrmester, D. (2009) The Network of Relationships
20、Inventory: Behavioral Systems Version, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 470-478. Additional validational information can be obtained from the studies using the measure. Scoring. Scale scores are derived by simply averaging the three items that make up each scale (see Scoring for
21、each version). If the response is missing for specific item, scale scores can be derived from the other two items. We do not recommend that scale scores be derived if only one item of the three is completed. We usually derive broad factor scores of social support (or closeness) and negative interact
22、ions (or discord) for each relationship. To do this, average the items on the relevant positive and negative scales (see Scoring for each version). We derive separate scores for each relationship. We have also created short form assessments of the factor scores. The short forms can be used if you ar
23、e only interested in factor scores, as scale scores should not be calculated from the short forms. It is also acceptable for you to include only those scales that you are particularly interested in. If you eliminate particular scales, however, you will not be able to derive the factor scores, which
24、contain those scales. Additionally, we request that you include all three items for any scale that you incorporate so as to insure comparability of results across studies.The Network of Relationships Social Provision VersionDescription. The NRI-SPV (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985) has ten scales with thr
25、ee items per scale. It assesses 7 support features, 2 negative interaction features, and relative power. ScalesCompanionship (COM)9How often do you spend fun time with this person?19How often do you and this person go places and do things together?29How often do you play around and have fun with thi
26、s person?Conflict (CON)10How often do you and this person disagree and quarrel with each other?20How often do you and this person get mad at or get in fights with each other?30How often do you and this person argue with each other?Instrumental Aid (AID)11How much does this person teach you how to do
27、 things that you dont know?21How much does this person help you figure out or fix things?31How much does this person help you when you need to get something done?Antagonism (ANT)12How much do you and this person get on each others nerves?22How much do you and this person get annoyed with each others
28、 behavior?33How much do you and this person hassle or nag one another?Intimate Disclosure (DIS)13How often do you tell this person things that you dont want others to know?23How often do you tell this person everything that you are going through?33How often do you share secrets and private feelings
29、with this person?Nurturance (NUR)14How much do you help this person with things she/he cant do by her/himself?24How much do you protect and look out for this person?34How much do you take care of this person?Affection (AFF)15How much does this person like or love you?25How much does this person real
30、ly care about you?35How much does this person have a strong feeling of affection (loving or liking) toward you?Reassurance of Worth (WOR)16How much does this person treat you like youre admired and respected?26How much does this person treat you like youre good at many things?36How much does this pe
31、rson like or approve of the things you do?Relative Power (POW)17Who tells the other person what to do more often, you or this person?27Between you and this person, who tends to be the BOSS in this relationship?37In your relationship with this person, who tends to take charge and decide what should b
32、e done?Reliable Alliance (ALL)18How sure are you that this relationship will last no matter what?28How sure are you that your relationship will last in spite of fights?38How sure are you that your relationship will continue in the years to come?Supplemental Scales. The following two scales were on t
33、he original NRI-SPV; the satisfaction scale was deleted because it is not a social provision; the antagonism scale replaced the punishment scale so that the measure could be applied more broadly. Either can, however, be added if desired.Satisfaction (SAT) How satisfied are you with your relationship
34、 with this person?How good is your relationship with this person?How happy are you with the way things are between you and this person?Punishment (PUN)How much does this person punish you?How much does this person discipline you for disobeying him/her?How much does this person scold you for doing so
35、mething you are not supposed to do?Scoring: Two second-order factors can be computed by averaging the items on the following scales:Support: Companionship, Instrumental Aid, Intimate Disclosure, Nurturance, Affection, Admiration, and Reliable Alliance Negative Interactions: Conflict and Antagonism.S
36、hort Form: We have also used a short form assessing support with items 16, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25, and 34 and negative interaction with items 10, 12, 20, 22, 30, and 32. If you use the short form, you will only be able to derive factor scores, not scale scores. Use of the Measure: You have permission to
37、 use and copy the measure that is included below. You can adjust the measure to assess the relationships youre interested in. You can also eliminate the unneeded items if using the short form or only some scales. Please retain all three items on a scale if you are deriving scale scores, and retain a
38、ll the scales/items to derive factor scores.Please cite the Social Provisions measure asFurman, W. & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Childrens perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016-1022. (Please cite the Behavioral Systems version as:Furman, W.
39、 & Buhrmester, D. (2009). The Network of Relationships Inventory: Behavioral Systems Version. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 470-478. Please cite the Relationship Qualities version as:Buhrmester, D. & Furman, W. (2008). The Network of Relationships Invetory:RelationshipQualitie
40、s Version. Unpublished measure, University of Texas at Dallas. ID # _ _ _ _Everyone has a number of people who are important in his or her life. These questions ask about your relationships with each of the following people: your mother, your father, a sibling, a relative, a grand-parent, a same-sex
41、 friend, and an opposite-sex friend. The first questions ask you to identify your mother figure, your father figure, a sibling, a relative, a grandparent, and two friends about whom you will be answering the questions.1. Circle the mother figure you will be describing. (If you have both, choose the
42、one you think of asyour primary mother figure.)A. Biological/Adopted Mother B. Step-Mother (or Fathers Significant Other)C. Other _2. Circle the father figure you will be describing. (If you have both, choose the one you think of asyour primary father figure.) A. Biological/Adopted FatherB. Step-Fat
43、her (or Mothers Significant Other)C. Other _3. If one of your brothers or sisters is participating in this study also, please choose him or her. If you do not have a sibling taking part in this study, please describe your relationship with the sibling you consider to be most important/closest to you
44、. (If several are equally important/close, just select one.) If you do not have a sibling, leave these questions blank. Your Siblings First Name _ How old is s/he? years old.4. Now we would like you to choose a relative who is/was most important to you. Is this person aa) grandmother, b) grandfather
45、, c) aunt, or d) uncle? (Please circle one.) The relatives first nameis .5. Now we would like you to choose a boy/girl friend whom you are dating or dated. You may choose someone you are seeing now, or someone you went out with earlier in high school. If you choose a past boy/girl friend, please ans
46、wer the questions as you would have when you were in the relationship.Boy/Girl Friends First Name _How long is/was the relationship? years months (please fill in numbers) Are you seeing this person now? A. YesB. No 6. Please choose the most important same-sex friend you have had in high school. You may select someone who is your most important same-sex friend now, or who was your most important same-sex friend earlier in high school. Do not choose a sibling. If you select a person with whom you are no longer friends, please answer the questions as you would have when you were in the re
