《GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT提分攻略.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT提分攻略.doc（9页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT提分攻略 GRE作文的计分方式是ARGUMENT和ISSUE两篇作文的平均分。许多考生写作得分不高其实是因为一篇虽然得到了高分却被另一篇*拖了后腿。面就和大家分享GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT同步提分备考攻略指点，来欣赏一下吧。GRE写作ISSUE和ARGUMENT同步提分备考攻略指点GRE写作Argument/Issue区别详解首先，来为大家介绍一下GER写作两篇作文的差别所在：1. 写作具体要求区别GRE ISSUE作文的写作要求，大体相当于中文里的立论文，也就是根据作文题目给出的内容自己确定一个论点观点后搭框架写*。而与之相对的ARGUMEN
2、T，则是驳论性质的*，需要考生根据给出的题目和观点进行反驳，也就是通俗意义上的挑错。2. 写作难度有所不同对于并非英语母语的中国考生来说，ISSUE作文的难度是比较高的，因为写好立论文需要考生自己根据题目提炼观点，如果考生本身的自主思维能力和创造力比较一般，很有可能出现不知道如何找观点写*的情况。而且不少考生存在缺乏主动思考能力的问题，对于写作比较被动，很容易就会写偏题。而ARGUMENT作文则相对简单一些，考生只需要根据给出的内容找逻辑漏洞和问题，并针对这些问题攻击挑错就能完成写作任务，更容易找到写作思路。3. 复习方法花费时间不同ISSUE作文需要花费更多的时间用于复习，理由上文已经说过，
3、中国考生大多更难写好ISSUE，因此练习的时间也会因此增加。而复习ISSUE作文的重点，应该放在准备作文模板和练习快速列提纲搭框架之上。考生看GRE机经真题等复习资料时，也应该更加着眼于从*题目的整体出发，把握住题目的主旨，提炼好观点节省考试时间。ARGUMENT作文难度较低，需要的复习时间也比较少。而复习ARGUMENT，考生则应该把注意力更多地集中在根据官方题库学习找逻辑漏洞进行攻击的具体写法上。因为哪怕题目千变万化，但能够用以攻击反驳的逻辑问题其实就那么固定的几种，大家只要练熟了找茬的本领学会了写作套路，想要写好ARGU并不困难。同时，考生在学习GRE作文机经时，对于ARGU部分的机经，
4、从*细节漏洞等角度入手会收获更好的复习效果。GRE写作同步提分攻略指点考生在面对两篇GRE作文时，应该如何确保高分呢?1. 两篇都不能放弃首先，大家需要明确的是，两篇作文无论哪篇都不能放弃，因为最后成绩是取两者平均值的，因此如果一篇作文分数很低，另一篇作文写得再好也会受拖累。2. 针对中国考生特点针对中国考生普遍ISSUE弱ARGU强的特点，比较合理的得分策略是保ISSUE合格和争ARGUMENT高分。ISSUE难度高，确保一个3.5分到4分的成绩比较稳妥，而ARGUMENT大家更容易写出出彩的好*，可以努力尝试挑战4.5甚至5分成绩。这样大家的作文平均分就能保持在4分以上，这就可以算是相当不
5、错的成绩了。GRE写作两篇作文相同点虽然GRE写作中的ISSUE作文和ARGUMENT作文有很多不同之处，但在一些基本的规范和要求上还是有共通之处的：1. *基本要求相同GRE两篇作文的考试时间都是30分钟。考生需要在30分钟内完成从审题到构思到最后成文的整个流程。而两篇*的文体风格也基本相同，都是属于议论文性质的写作。因此，很多考生比较惧怕的描述类*就不会有所涉及了。同时，虽然GRE考试本身并没有做出任何字数方面的限制和要求，但根据历年来的高分范文总结，一般作文字数在400-500字左右是比较稳妥的，这一点ISSUE和ARGUMENT两篇作文也没有太大区别。2. *评分标准相同除了规范要求外
6、，GRE两篇作文在评分标准上也是基本相同的。满分都为6分。最后总得分为两篇作文分数的平均值。大致都可以分为*整体结构、逻辑思维能力、对于词句语法的运用以及论据素材的使用这几个方面。当然，由于两篇*本身具体写作要求的区别，可能在一些评分细节上还存在不同。3. 官方复习资源相同无论是ISSUE作文还是ARGUMENT作文，两篇GRE作文的复习资源也是基本相同的。除了ETS官方公布的作文题库外，高分范文、黄金词句和论据素材都是帮助考生练习写作能力锻炼作文水平需要用到的复习必备材料。总而言之，GRE考试两篇作文的得分大家都不能放松，想要真正提高GRE写作部分的成绩，考生就需要把两篇作文的成绩都提升上来
7、，而*中讲解的这些提分方法得分策略，相信能够给大家带来一些帮助。GRE写作满分范文The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers
8、or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can b
9、e built there, and substantial acreage would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland.A school sho
10、uld serve all students living nearby so that they can commute in a short distance. That will provide the better basic-human-needs. It is questioned that whether it is appropriate to establish a school in the area without locating houses. On the other hand, wouldnt it be good if the land is left unto
11、uch?These are the facts of argument that readers might have after reading the message. The information is too opinionate therefore develop many questions. The writing given in the first part does not support the rest.Comments:The first paragraph of this fundamentally deficient response is apparently
12、 attempting to summarize the issues and terms of the argument. The attempt, though, is almost completely obscured by errors and the disorganized presentation of ideas. Paragraph 2 offers only the assessment that the information is too opinionate therefore develop many questions.The response warrants
13、 a score of 1 because it exhibits three of the scoring guide characteristics for a 1:- provides little evidence of the ability to understand and analyzethe argument- has severe and persistent errors in language and sentence structure- contains a pervasive pattern of errors in grammar, usage, andmech
14、anics that results in incoherenceGRE写作满分范文Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?regions?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.?Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.?But?the?spe
15、ed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?regions?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce
16、?Forestvilles?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?When?we?compare?two?things,?we?like?to?put?them?on?the?same?background.?same?condition.?For?the?fact?given?above,?in?the?same?time,?foundmentally,?the?two?region?have?the?same?traffic?condition,?except,?the?speedlimit?is?improved?in?one,?
17、and?the?other?keep?the?same.?So?we?can?get?the?result?that?the?reason?of?the?difference?is?that?the?improved?speed?limit.?And?also?the?change?will?give?some?other?inconvinent?to?the?people?there.?For?example,?the?people?will?not?familiar?with?the?change,?have?some?problem?in?handle?the?speed.?So,?wh
18、at?I?think?is?that?the?citizen?should?show?the?government?the?statistic?number?of?the?difference.?Argue?with?them.?Comments:?This?response?is?fundamentally?deficient?as?a?critique?for?two?reasons:?-?although?the?writer?has?relied?heavily?on?the?language?of?the?topic,?it?is?clear?that?the?writer?has?no?real?control?of?language,?and?-?there?is?little?or?no?evidence?of?the?writers?ability?to?develop?an?organized?response.?GRE写作
