《GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得.doc（10页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得 GRE写作中能够同时兼顾立论文ISSUE和驳论文ARGUMENT两篇作文高分的考生较少，许多同学都是在保证一篇*平均水平的前提下努力写好另一篇*来提分的。下面就和大家分享GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得，来欣赏一下吧。GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得GRE立论文issue经验分享对于立论文(Issue)说，我觉得自己动手拟一份提纲是非常有用的，你可以参考各种资料，但必须勤动脑，想一想提纲的逻辑连续性。实际上，有偏向性、但又不要绝对化的思路才是最易上手的。GRE驳论文argument怎么练?对于驳论文(Argument)而言，我认为熟悉题库更为重要。正常情况下是这样的，但的
2、确有些难题若不事先好好准备，五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时，我正是因为在准备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目，而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目，所以写得很不好。写驳论文有很多小窍门，如需要锻炼出区别“事实”和“观点”的能力，不论题目中所给的事实有多夸张都需认为它是对的，不能攻击，只能攻击观点中的逻辑漏洞;凡是跟统计数字、统计方法有关的逻辑错误都尽量不要攻击，最多只能一笔带过等等。GRE作文逻辑重要吗?虽然逻辑作文满分只有6分，可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说，它是GRE的精华因为GRE考的就是逻辑，用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已，主要目的就是考察你的逻辑分析水平。怎
3、样看待GRE作文中的语言水平?至于GRE作文的语言，其实不是很重要，只要通顺、没有语法错误就可以了，掌握了这些就可以更好地备考GRE作文。希望可以给大家一些参考，从而更好地备考GRE阅读考试。GRE写作满分范文Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?regions?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.?Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?ac
4、cidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.?But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?ac
5、cidents?on?the?regions?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestvilles?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?At?first?look,?this?seems?to?be?a?very?well?presented?arguement.?A?logical?path?is?followed?throughout?the?paragraph?and?the?conclusion?is?expected.?However,?upon?a?second?con
6、sideration,?it?is?apparent?that?all?possibilities?were?not?considered?when?the?author?presented?his?conclusion?(or?at?least?that?s/he?did?not?present?all?of?the?possibilities).?There?are?numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?in?Forestv
7、ille?increased.?Although?it?seems?logical?to?assume?that?the?difference?in?the?percentage?of?accidents?was?due?to?the?difference?in?whether?or?not?the?speed?limit?had?been?increased?during?the?specified?month,?this?does?not?necessarily?mean?that?the?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?what?it?orig
8、inally?was?in?Forestville.?The?author?does?not?state?two?specific?pieces?of?information?that?are?important?before?a?conclusion?such?as?the?one?the?author?made?is?sound.?The?first?is?that?it?is?not?expressed?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?neighboring?regions?had?had?the?same?speed?limit?before?F
9、orestvilles?speed?limit?had?been?increased.?If?they?had?originally?been?the?same,?then?it?is?reasonable?to?conclude?that?Forestvilles?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?However,?if?the?two?regions?speed?limits?were?initially?different,?then?such?a?conclusion?can?n
10、ot?be?made.?The?second?piece?of?information?that?is?necessary?for?the?present?argument?is?the?relative?number?of?accidents?in?each?of?the?areas?prior?to?the?increase?in?speed?limit.?For?the?author?to?make?the?presented?conclusion,?the?number?of?accidents?should?have?been?approximately?equal?prior?to
11、?the?increase?in?the?speed?limit?in?Forestville.?If?the?two?missing?pieces?of?information?had?been?presented?and?were?in?the?authors?favor,?then?the?conclusion?that?the?author?made?would?have?been?much?more?sound?than?it?currently?is.?In?conclusion,?the?argument?is?not?entirely?well?reasoned,?but?gi
12、ven?the?information?that?was?expressed?in?the?paragraph,?it?was?presented?well,?and?in?a?logical?order.?Comments:?This?competent?critique?claims?that?there?are?numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?in?Forestville?increased.?However,?th
13、e?author discusses?only?two?points:?-?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?regions?were?originally?the?same;?and?-?the?number?of?accidents?in?each?region?prior?to?Forestvilles?raising?the?speed?limit.?Although?the?response?appears?at?first?to?be?well?developed,?there?is?much?less?analysis?here?than?t
14、he?length?would?suggest.?The?first?third?and?last?third?of?the?essay?are?relatively?insubstantial,?consisting?mainly?of?general?summary?statements?(e.g.,?A?logical?path?conclusion?is?expected?and?If?the?two?more?sound?than?it?currently?is).?The?real?heart?of?the?critique?consists?of?minimal?developm
15、ent?of?the?two?points?mentioned?above.?Therefore,?although?two?important?features?of?the?argument?are?analyzed?and?the?writer?handles?language?and?syntax?adequately,?the?lack?of?substantial?development?keeps?this?critique?from?earning?a?score?higher?than?4.GRE写作满分范文Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Fores
16、tville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?regions?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.?Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.?But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?
17、and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?regions?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestvilles?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?The?agrument?i
18、s?well-presented,?but?not?thoroughly?well-reasoned.?By?making?a?comparison?of?the?region?of?Forestville,?the?town?with?the?higher?speed?limit?and?therefore?automobile?accidents,?with?the?region?of?Elmsford,?an?area?of?a?lower?speed?limit?and?subsequently?fewer?accidents,?the?argument?for?reducing?Fo
19、restvilles?speed?limits?in?order?to?decrease?accidents?seems?logical.?However,?the?citizens?of?Forestville?are?failing?to?consider?other?possible?alternatives?to?the?increasing?car?accidents?after?the?raise?in?speed?limit.?Such?alternatives?may?include?the?fact?that?there?are?less?reliable?cars?trav
20、eling?the?roads?in?Forestville,?or?that?the?age?bracket?of?those?in?Elmsford?may?be?more?conducive?to?driving?safely.?It?is?possible?that?there?are?more?younger,?inexperienced,?or?more?elderly,?unsafe?drivers?in?Forestville?than?there?are?in?Elmsford.?In?addition,?the?citizens?have?failed?to?conside
21、r?the?geographical?and?physical?terrain?of?the?two?different?areas.?Perhaps?Forestvilles?highway?is?in?an?area?of?more?dangerous?curves,?sharp?turns,?or?has?many?intersections?or?merging?points?where?accidents?are?more?likely?to?occur.?It?appears?reasonable,?therefore,?for?the?citizens?to?focus?on?t
22、hese?trouble?spots?than?to?reduce?the?speed?in?the?entire?area.?Elmsford?may?be?an?area?of?easier?driving?conditions?where?accidents?are?less?likely?to?occur?regardless?of?the?speed?limit.?A?six-month?period?is?not?a?particularly?long?time?frame?for?the?citizens?to?determine?that?speed?limit?has?inf
23、luenced?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?the?area.?It?is?mentioned?in?the?argument?that?Elmsford?accidents?decreased?during?the?time?period.?This?may?have?been?a?time,?such?as?during?harsh weather?conditions,?when?less?people?were?driving?on?the?road?and?therefore?the?number?of?accidents?decrea
24、sed.?However,?Forestville?citizens,?perhaps?coerced?by?employment?or?other?requirements,?were?unable?to?avoid?driving?on?the?roads.?Again,?the?demographics?of?the?population?are?important.?It?is?possible?that?Elmsford?citizens?do?not?have?to?travel?far?from?work?or?work?from?their?home,?or?do?not?wo
25、rk?at?all.?Are?there?more?people?in?Forestville?than?there?were?sic?months?ago?If?so,?there?may?be?an?increased?number?of?accidents?due?to?more?automobiles?on?the?road,?and?not?due?to?the?increased?speed?limits.?Also?in?reference?to?the?activities?of?the?population,?it?is?possible?that?Forestville?i
26、nhabitants?were?traveling?during?less?safe?times?of?the?day,?such?as?early?in?the?morning,?or?during?twilight.?Work?or?family?habits?may?have?encouraged?citizens?to?drive?during?this?time?when?Elmsford?residents?may?not?have?been?forced?to?do?so.?Overall,?the?reasoning?behind?decreasing?Forestvilles
27、?speed?limit?back?to?its?original?seems?logical?as?presented?above?since?the?citizens?are?acting?in?their?own?best?interests?and?want?to?protect?their?safety.?However,?before?any?final?decisions?are?made?about?the?reduction?in?speed?limit,?the?citizens?and?officials?of?Forestville?should?evaluate?al
28、l?possible?alternatives?and?causes?for?the?increased?number?of?accidents?over?the?six-month?period?as?compared?to?Elmsford.?Comments:?This?outstanding?response?begins?by?noting?that?the?argument?is?well?presented.?It?then?proceeds?to?discuss?possible?alternative?explanations?for?the?increase?in?car?
29、accidents?and?provides?an?impressively?full?analysis.?Alternatives?mentioned?are?that?-?the?two?regions?might?have?drivers?of?different?ages?and?experience;?-?Forestvilles?topography,?geography,?cars,?and/or?roads?might?contribute?to?accidents;?-?six?months?might?be?an?insufficient?amount?of?time?fo
30、r?determining?that?the?speed?limit?is?linked?to?the?accident?rate;?-?demographics?might?play?a?role?in?auto?accidents;?-?population?and?auto?density?should?be?considered;?and?-?the?times?of?day?when?drivers?in?the?two?regions?travel?might?be?relevant.?The?points?are?cogently?developed?and?are?linked
31、?in?such?a?way?as?to?create?a?logically?organized?critique.?Transitions?together?with?interior?connections?create?a?smoothly?integrated?presentation.?For?the?most?part,?the?writer?uses?language?correctly?and?well?and?provides?excellent?variety?in?syntax.?The?minor?flaws?(e.g.,?using?less?instead?of?fewer)?do?not?detract?from?the?overall?high?quality?of?the?critique.?This?is?an?impressive?6?paper.?GRE写作
