《刑法论文环境行政不作为的法律责任研究.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《刑法论文环境行政不作为的法律责任研究.doc（3页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、环境行政不作为的法律责任研究 环境行政不作为的法律责任研究 The Research of the Legal Liability of Environment Administration Untaking 【中文摘要】 随着国家对环境保护力度的加大,环境行政不作为已成为了社会的焦点。环境行政不作为以其隐蔽的形式放任在环境行政主体的环境监管职权和职责中,不仅损害了相对人的合法权益和公共环境利益,而且还损害了环境行政主体的公信力和权威性,使地方和部门保护主义泛滥导致守法成本高、违法成本低的被动局面。目前我国环境行政法学界对环境行政不作为法律责任的研究探讨不多,司法实践中也存在着许多模糊的认识。
2、文章共分为五个部分:第一部分主要说明文章产生的现实背景和国内外的研究现状来进一步说明对环境行政不作为法律责任研究的目的和意义。第二部分主要分析了环境行政不作为法律责任的基本理论问题,说明了环境行政不作为的内涵和特点,在此基础上,指明了环境行政不作为法律责任的概念,探讨了环境行政不作为法律责任的认定要素。第三部分笔者首先对环境行政不作为法律责任现状进行了分析,总结了我国环境行政不作为行政责任和刑事责任的规定。其次,根据对我国环境行政不作为法律责任现状的分析,提出了我国环境行政不作为法律责任存在的问题。第四部分笔者主要介绍了英美法系和大陆法系国家对环境行政不作为法律责任的规定,对其进行分析归类,总
3、结了有关完善环境行政不作为法律责任的经验,为完善我国相关的法律制度提供了必要的借鉴。第五部分主要说明如何完善我国环境行政不作为法律责任,提出了建立行政赔偿责任法律制度、完善行政法律责任的形式体系、创建抽象环境行政不作为司法审查制度、规定严格具体的行政法律责任等构想。【英文摘要】 Along with the country to environmental protection dynamics enlargement, the environment administration does not take has become societys focal point. The envir
4、onment administration does not take by its covert form laissez faire in the environment administration subject environment supervision authority and the responsibility, not only has harmed the relative persons legitimate rights and interests and the public environment benefit, and has also harmed th
5、e environment administration main body male letter strength and the authority, causes the place and department protectionism is in flood causes the obeying the law cost high, the illegal cost low passive aspect. At present our country environment administrative law educational world does not take th
6、e legal liability to the environment administration the research discussion not to be many, in the judicial practice also has many fuzzy understanding. The article altogether divides into five parts: The first part of main explanation article produces the realistic background and the domestic and fo
7、reign research present situation further showed that does not take the legal liability research to the environment administration the goal and the significance. The second part mainly analyzed the environment administration not to take the legal liability the elementary theory question, explained th
8、e environment administration not achievements connotation and the characteristic, based on this, indicated the environment administration not to take the legal liability the concept, discussed the environment administration not to recognize the essential factor as the legal liability. The third part
9、 of author first has not carried on the analysis to the environment administration as the legal liability present situation, summarized our country environment administration not to take the administrative responsibility and the legal responsibility stipulation. Next, according to does not take the
10、legal liability present situation to our country environment administration the analysis, proposed our country environment administration does not take the legal liability existence the question. The fourth part of author mainly introduced the UK-US legal system and the mainland legal system country
11、 does not take the legal liability to the environment administration the stipulation, carries on the analysis classification to it, summarized the related consummation environment administration not to take the legal liability the experience, to consummate our country related legal regime to provide
12、 essential model. The fifth part mainly explained how to consummate our country environment administration not to take the legal liability, proposed the establishment administration liability of compensation legal regime, the consummation administration legal liabilitys formalism, the foundation abs
13、tract environment administration does not take the judicial review system, conception and so on stipulation strict concrete administration legal liability. 【中文关键词】 环境行政; 不作为; 法律责任; 行政责任; 刑事责任 【英文关键词】 Environment administration; unmaking; Legal liability; Administrative responsibility; Legal responsi
14、bility 【毕业论文目录】 环境行政不作为的法律责任研究摘要 4-5 Abstract 5-6 1 绪论 9-13 1.1 课题背景 9-10 1.2 国内外研究现状 10-12 1.3 课题研究的目的和意义 12-13 2 环境行政不作为法律责任的基本理论 13-21 2.1 环境行政不作为法律责任的内涵与功能 13-15 2.1.1 环境行政不作为的内涵与特点 13-14 2.1.2 环境行政不作为法律责任的概念与功能 14-15 2.2 环境行政不作为法律责任的认定要素 15-19 2.2.1 环境行政不作为法律责任的主体要素 15-16 2.2.2 环境行政不作为法律责任的作为义务
15、要素 16-18 2.2.3 环境行政不作为法律责任的危害后果要素 18-19 2.3 本章小结 19-21 3 环境行政不作为法律责任存在的问题 21-25 3.1 我国环境行政不作为法律责任的现状 21-23 3.1.1 我国环境行政不作为行政责任的规定 21-22 3.1.2 我国环境行政不作为刑事责任的规定 22-23 3.2 我国环境行政不作为法律责任存在的问题 23-24 3.2.1 未明确规定行政赔偿责任 23 3.2.2 法律责任的体系不够合理 23 3.2.3 法律责任的规定不够具体和严厉 23-24 3.2.4 抽象环境行政不作为未纳入司法审查范围 24 3.2.5 承担刑
16、事责任的主体范围过窄 24 3.3 本章小结 24-25 4 外国和台湾地区环境行政不作为法律责任的借鉴 25-33 4.1 外国和台湾地区有关环境行政不作为法律责任的规定 25-30 4.1.1 英美法系的实践规定 25-27 4.1.2 大陆法系的实践规定 27-30 4.2 外国和台湾地区有关环境行政不作为法律责任的借鉴 30-32 4.2.1 环境行政责任的经验借鉴 30-31 4.2.2 环境刑事责任的经验借鉴 31-32 4.3 本章小结 32-33 5 完善我国环境行政不作为法律责任之思考 33-42 5.1 完善环境行政不作为行政责任之思考 33-38 5.1.1 建立行政赔偿责任法律制度 33-35 5.1.2 完善行政法律责任形式体系 35-37 5.1.3 创建抽象环境行政不作为司法审查制度 37-38 5.1.4 规定严格具体的行政法律责任 38 5.2 完善环境行政不作为刑事责任之思考 38-41 5.2.1 扩大刑事责任承担主体的范围 38-39 5.2.2 增加刑罚种类和加重刑事处罚 39-40 5.2.3 合理衔接行政责任与刑事责任 40-41 5.3 本章小结 41-42 结论 42-43 参考文献 43-45 攻读学位期间发表的学术论文 45-46 致谢 46-47
