《The hare with amber eyes a family's century of art and loss.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《The hare with amber eyes a family's century of art and loss.doc（9页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、Book Review by Michael Tooby The Hare with Amber Eyesby Edmund de Waal354 pagesChatto and Windus, London, 2010The reviews of Edmund de Waals new book have usually mentioned that he is a potter, perhaps the most famous potter working in Britain today.Notes Rachel Cook, The Observer, 6 June 2010. As i
2、s now well known, the book is not about pots. It is a personal account which traces how a collection of traditional Japanese netsuke, 264 miniature carvings in ivory and wood, came to him. De Waal frames the book with its relevance to his practice:I am the fifth generation of the family to inherit t
3、his collection, and it is my story too. I am a maker: I make pots. How things are made, how they are handled and what happens to them has been central to my life for over thirty years. So too has Japan, a place I went to when I was 17 to study pottery. How objects embody memory - or more particularl
4、y, whether objects can hold memories - is a real question for me. Website text : For a readership of the book made up of those who are already familiar with his career as a ceramicist and curator / polemicist, this is the obvious way to read this memoir: look out for references to materials; registe
5、r descriptions of porcelain in its various types of manufacture; develop further the understanding of the dialogue between Europe and Japan. There is the way in which the narrative traces back an affinity with things gathered and collected and displayed. We have repeated insights onto the experience
6、 of architecture, of place, and the journeys which objects make. These are all there from the outset. One rapidly realises, however, that the real momentum behind the book is the relationships between the people brought to life in describing the journey the netsuke collection has made. Edmund de Waa
7、l writes with a wonderful mix of the essayists precision and the novelists evocation of time, character and place. He has a terrific sense of telling detail and nuance. He also carries us along with his own passion and honesty. He risks hubris by using the device of placing his own enquiry in the fo
8、reground. He sets up the project by explaining his first encounter with the netsuke collection at a crucial point in his early career. Having studied in the traditional studio ceramic practice and in the traditional English university, he has moved on through a scholarship to study and work in Tokyo
9、. He works in the archive at the Mingeikan. The Tokyo apartment of his great Uncle, known as Iggie, provides both a kind of refuge and a signal to the young mans taste and outlook. He wins the readers acceptance and appreciation of this self-reference by the directness with which he expresses, at di
10、fferent moments, love, empathy, distaste and anger. At the outset, for example, he gives a moving description of returning to Tokyo for his great Uncles funeral. He thereby explains that he eventually inherits the collection, and that the present book is the result of a decision to fill out through
11、research with due thoroughness his hitherto basic grasp of the story of the collection. The first of the three main sections one for each generation sees de Waal travelling to Paris, seeking out both documentary sources and real places associated with his great great-uncle, Charles Ephrussi who firs
12、t acquired the collection. Switching between tenses, the research project is in the recent past while the authors encounters with real places and the deep past are both described in the active present. We gradually realise that Charles is at the heart of Parisian cultural life, a critic and editor,
13、and the model for Prousts character Swann. De Waal then moves on to Vienna, following the netsuke when they are given as a wedding present to Charles cousin Viktor. Over the course of Viktors life, Vienna evolves. It fades as the last capital of the Habsburg empire, becomes a new city of the modern
14、world, and one of the places at the heart of the European tragedy begotten by post Imperialism and anti-Semitism. De Waals great grandfather and his family and friends personify the kind of enemy that the forces of proto-fascism begin to target. In fact, one of the most powerful dimensions of the bo
15、ok, permitted by the authors openness of exegesis, is to vivify anti-Semitism. The era of the Dreyfuss affair is the context for Charles later career in Paris. In Vienna, de Waal demonstrates how generalised, how embedded in everyday society anti-Semitism was over the decades that the young Hitler g
16、rew up in Vienna. Uncle Iggie, for example, describes walking in the Alps, in the time soon after the First World War, when identity cards were required: It was already cold, but there was a hut, full of students round the stove and cheerful noise. They asked us for our cards and then told us to get
17、 out, told us that Jews polluted the mountain air. De Waal, The Hare with Amber Eyes, p.206.We see the vast new apartment block in which the family lived, their holidays in homes in Hungary and Switzerland. We see an intellectual and artistic heritage, and a kind of permissiveness about sexual relat
18、ionships quietly accommodated in family life. The architectural and collecting taste of the family is used as a counterpoint and harmony to these themes: There is light in these rooms, trembling reflections and glints of silver and porcelain and polished fruitwood, and shadows from the linden trees.
19、 Ibid p.155.The dreadful unfolding of the fate of the family through the later lives of the authors great grandparents and the early lives of his grandparents should be left in the reading of the book. However, it is worth noting that by this stage, perhaps two-thirds to three quarters through, some
20、 questions are answered. The books sub-title is an example. The nature of a hidden inheritance is linked both to subterfuge how did families retain precious possessions in such upheaval, even when so much was lost or destroyed? and to identity to what extent is there no coincidence, luck or happenst
21、ance in such stories, merely a realisation of the hidden poetry involved in understanding how people remain connected to one another over time, through shared values, loves and memories? As the netsuke collection approaches its move to its (presently) penultimate home, we are back in post-war Japan.
22、 A directness in the authors relationship to the place, the collection, returns to the narrative. The history of the netsuke, their re-interpretation and experience for different generations figures particularly in the closing passages of the book, returning as they do to Japan. De Waal reconsiders
23、how they represent a refiguring of what Japanese now means, after the war, through the eyes of occupying powers, in contrast to the exotic, eroticised Japonaiserie that was the taste through which great-great uncle Charles was first drawn to them. A visit to Odessa, the place that had to be left beh
24、ind, provincial even if the original source of the familys wealth, plays ironically as a last stage in his research : As I stand in front of the museum with its statue of a wrestling Laocoon, the one that Charles drew for Viktor, I realise how wrong Ive been .Just because Odessa was a dusty city, wi
25、th its stevedores and sailors, stokers, fisherman, divers, smugglers, adventurers, swindlers, and their grandfather Joachim, the great chancer in his Palais, did not that mean that it was not full of writers and artists too. Ibid p.344. So the author eventually brings us home, to his own home in Lon
26、don and his own life and work. This allows a reappraisal of the initial thoughts about how the narrative relates to de Waals studio practice. Yes, specific references to his exhibitions and projects have been prompted: the metaphor of opening doors in recent work; images of containers, packed away,
27、about to leave or just arrived; memory and experience and the idea of rediscovering ones past through autodidacticism or research in his Kettles Yard installation; the sense of rediscovery of collections and collectors in Cardiff; the idea of revealing hidden treasures in Dartington or MIMA; the div
28、erse ways in which we understand objects in architectural space in so many projects, from Blackwell and Chatsworth in England to the Kunstindustrimuseum in Copenhagen. Kettles Yard Cambridge, mima Middlesbrough, 2007; Arcanum : mapping 18th century porcelain, National Museum Cardiff, 2005; Line Arou
29、nd a Shadow, Blackwell House, Cumbria, 2005; A Sounding Line, Chatsworth, Derbyshire, 2007; Porcelain room, Kunstindustrimuseum, Copenhagen, 2004. De Waal noted in the publication accompanying the Blackwell project how the places he has worked in have been akin to a personal journey through differen
30、t buildings: This way of working, of responding to a building in such a way as to articulate it, converse with it, reveal a different history or interrogate a forgotten past has become an intensely pleasurable path for me. I have been fortunate enough to work with a High Modernist villa (High Cross
31、House in Devon), a contemporary pavilion attached to an 18th century Orangery (Munckenbeck and Marshalls New Art Centre) and an Edwardian museum (The National Museum in Cardiff). And he describes how the intimidating challenge of Blackwells architectural specificity was alleviated by the awareness o
32、f its history of different uses, different occupants: So pots have been made for particular spaces, some very public and obvious, others more private and hidden. Edmund de Waal, Line around a Shadow, Lakeland Arts Trust, 2005.In a later text, de Waal explores this sensitivity to specific sites vis a
33、 vis the fact that groups of objects may be situated in different sites over their lifetime. In many ways the works made for Kettles Yard and mima are not discrete installations, they are a movement through a series of charged places within those buildings. The exhibitions are about how things work
34、and what happens when you move a thing from one place to another. Extract from interview with Edmund de Waal by David Hills and Elizabeth Fisher in Edmund de Waal at Kettles Yard, mima and elsewhere, Cambridge and Middlesbrough, 2007.Aside from the connections to the motifs and themes of the memoir,
35、 these projects remind us that De Waals practice has been characterised by demanding an authorial voice in both the practice and critical framework for ceramics. The foregrounding of the authorial voice in the memoir affirms de Waals position as both a writer and a potter. In a memoir about his real
36、 family, suffused with love and empathy, we are reminded of his relationship with his ur-father, Bernard Leach, this being a complex brew of admiration and critique. De Waals attitude to Leach is in large part driven by his feeling for the relationships between what Leach says in his texts and what
37、he made, how he ran his practice. De Waal is particularly anxious about how Leachs writing established the canon by which his own work was judged. Edmund de Waal, Bernard Leach, Tate Publishing, London, 1997.Of his own career, de Waal has commented: The challenge for me is that I am a potter from th
38、e Leach tradition but also a critic who studied literature at Cambridge University. And I have written books and many essays, and most of my friends are novelists and critics, not potters. I come from a background of literature as well as pottery. Edmund de Waal in Discussion : Study on Bernard Leac
39、h and Studio Pottery, Edmund de Waal and Kenji Kaneko, 2005 in Rethinking Bernard Leach: Studio Pottery and Contemporary Ceramics (Japanese Edition) Tokyo, Shibunkaku Publishing Co. 2007.In the Hare with Amber Eyes , foregrounding the authorial voice parallels de Waals practice in that an intellectu
40、al or experiential grounding of idea is, or should be, integral to the experience of the physicality of the object in the work. The nature of his installations are that certain crucial qualities, understood as paradigmatic of ceramic practices, are challenged or unpacked in an active way by the evid
41、ently authorial manner of presentation. Consider his writing about the sensory experience of objects. Whilst many reviewers have noted, rightly, the power of description of touch in Hare with Amber Eyes, the keenness of the writing about fragility, about the feel of objects, de Waals installations a
42、nd objects are often about the denial of that possibility. We might glimpse a profusion of pots inside containers, or find them high up on isolated shelves. Other times we ask a minder nearby if we are allowed to open a door, to step up to look inside a raised box. Sometimes we are allowed, often we
43、 are not. Books about collections and collectors usually have the luxury of not requiring to physically deploy the collections themselves. Freedom from constraints of scale, weight and fragility allows authors to create juxtapositions of reproductions. So, one of the most curious, or more likely, mo
44、st calculated and subtle, devices of Edmund de Waals book is that there are no illustrations of the very objects of the collection which is its prompt, its central motif, its raison detre. To see reproductions of the netsuke themselves, we must travel through web pages and print out press releases,
45、none of which are referenced in the book. Meanwhile the recurring image of the memoir which constantly draws us back to this theme is the image of the vitrine. The vitrine which went with the collection from Paris to Vienna. The new display unit created for the netsuke in Tokyo. The replacement vitr
46、ine found in London bought from the Victoria and Albert Museum when declared redundant by recent refurbishment, in fact. In Paris, de Waal declares : Now that Charles has one of his own, I realise they are part of the performance of salon life, not just part of the furnishings. . The vitrines exist
47、so that you can see objects, but not touch them : they frame things, suspend them, tantalise through distance. / This is what I realise now I failed to understand about vitrines. I spent the first twenty years of my life as a potter earnestly trying to get objects out of the glass cases in which my
48、pots were often placed in galleries and museums./ But the vitrine as opposed to the museums case is for opening. And that opening glass door and the moment of looking, then choosing, and then reaching in and then picking up is a moment of seduction, an encounter between a hand and an object that is electric. Ibid p.65. Are museums about objects or stories? asked a recent conference Are Museums about stories or objects? contributions recorded in Museum ID issue 2, London, 2009. The question needed to be asked, it was argued, since so many experiences of objects in museums
