《GRE写作冲刺经验.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE写作冲刺经验.doc（12页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、GRE写作冲刺经验 今天给大家带来GRE写作冲刺经验，快来一起看看吧，分享下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。GRE写作冲刺经验GRE作文最后冲刺经验谈：首先，我们在最后几天得树立自己的信心，没有信心，考试肯定会慌，容易发挥失常。我们的目标很明确，我们大多数人不是冲着6分去的，我们理科生4分够了，文科生得5分，关键还是我们的专业水平，研究能力。我们应该看的是argument的各种类型错误的总结，这个一定要熟，我们考场想正常发挥，肯定得靠反射型思维，毕竟，argument是我们的重头戏。比如我们对于一个建议我们要考虑如下：这个改变是否多余?现状是否足够应付?这个改变要多少钱呢?能够承担吗?有没有其他
2、的更好的方法呢?是否所有人都需要?有无成功先例?效果如何?有无副作用?有无考虑受影响的人的态度和意见?对于一个比较对象我们需要考虑：代表性?他因?是否是异常?以前的正常的状态不是这样。aberration采取措施的改善效果程度如何?What extent to the participants improve。趋势能否保持?有没有不利的方面没有提供?时间太短看不出效果?以前的经验不能反映现在实际情况。我们还有study方面的问题：代表性?数量够吗?统计时间是什么时候吗?权威性?表述真实意见吗?这个前人总结得很好了。还有其他的一些错误，如，过去-现在;全局-局部;局部-全局;数量不代表比例，总量
3、上升可能比例下降。其实关键在于他因的积累，这个可以丰富一篇argument的内容，增加它的可信性,我下面举几个常见的例子：商品的销售情况，市场，利润：a function of supply and demand; quality; price;formidable competitor; national and international economic climate;demographic changes; companys reputation; ad strategy;a waning of interest in X.X.X among people;supply or dis
4、tribution problems; market has become satutated; management and market problem; the changes of policy and law;material and labor price; improvement in training of workers.其实这个是大家积累的过程.这个大家用一个本子去记，很快就可以收到很多了。句型其实很简单，但我不鼓励大家用模版，因为它会限制你的思路，其实每个题都有各自的特色，我们在驳论的过程中，需要很大灵活性，这个可以多看看范文，打开我们驳论的思路，看老外280会抑制自己的
5、写作思路的。因此，我认为关键要找到自己常用写作风格的句型。这个得自己去主动发现，去找。看完了这些已经烂熟于心的阿狗套路和思路后，我们应该去总结一下自己的一休的思路，其实写多的人会发现所有的题都有一些共同点，我们可以从某几个方面去研究，这其实我觉得能用上很多哲学的东西。比如，事物变化论，举个例子吧，历史与现实的很多题就可以用到，社会和行为很多道也可以用;万事都是不同的;人的社会性;科学的局限性;群众的力量是无限的;社会精英论;人的天性;人的思维局限性;社会资源的有限性;人的偏见性;人的主观能动性。还有一些其他的共同点，就是定义和起源。写*的一种思路：刨根问底去看问题的产生是为何?为什么会出现这样
6、的问题?这叫历史唯物主义，从问题的本质和事务的概念开始发散的去写，去想，可以打开思路;还有一种叫辩证唯物主义，我们要去想想，过于极端的去承认某种观点，或否认会出现什么问题呢?如果没有了这种东西，会是什么样的呢?我认为考场发挥的最关键因素是你的模考如何。不是说你的次数越多越有用。如下几点得注意：1.要在思想上把模考看成正式考试。2.可能按照考试时间安排模考时间。而且中间不能休息，连续写一篇一休和一篇argument3.议录上狂敲键盘声(考场上的隔音不好)，然后模考时狂重放，既可以模拟考场的紧张气氛，也可以练一下个人的抗干扰能力。对于机警，我蛮相信的，关键在于我们机警覆盖面不够大，缺少热心的人们上
7、传机警。还有一点是我希望以后的人写机警时还要注上自己的学科。这个很重要。如果你不嫌麻烦而且时间多的话，我建议你去考场那里埋伏几天，打听所有的人题目。当然最好是有人可以帮你干这件事。但对我那个十二天和四天的规律不信，因为本身就有问题，大家想一下就知道了，十二天和四天之间也就隔八天，是不是八天的也要看呢?其实我觉得关键在于每个人的专业和学历有关，当然还有你父母的咯。到时候这些都是问卷的一部分。大家要好好填哦。还有一点提醒大家，考前的若干天，记住休息和睡眠，千万不可以生病，如果你考试那天你已经很兴奋了，不要去喝红牛，吃巧克力。这个不是所有人都适合的。GRE写作解析The following appe
8、ared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette.On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island sh
9、ould limit the number of mopeds rented by the islands moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring islan
10、d of Seaville, when Seavilles town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questio
11、ns would help to evaluate the recommendation.步骤：夏天人口增多 + 摩托车是主要交通工具 到了夏天摩托车引起的事故会增多假设：夏天增多的人口会造成严重的摩托车问题反例：城市交通秩序好，摩托车司机都很职业，很守规矩，历年来都没出什么事故补充证据：往年夏天的摩托车事故率步骤：SV执行了摩托车禁令 + 之后SV的事故减少50% 是禁令减少的事故假设：没有它因反例：道路拓宽;司机培训更严格;交通法规更严格;警察多了补充证据：步骤：SV成功 BI成功假设：两城的租赁摩托车都是主要摩托车的*;过去两城摩托车都能够租出去反例：SV的摩托车都是租的，但是BI的摩托
12、车都是私家的;SV的都租出去了，但是BI的本来就租不到每天25辆补充证据：两城摩托车的主要*;既往摩托车每天实际租赁量步骤：BI成功减少夏天的事故全年事故的减少假设：夏天的事故是全年事故的主要*反例：夏天路况好，人多不是事故的*。全年事故主要*于冬天路面结冰。而冬天车辆没减少，所以事故不会减少50%证据：全年的事故数量变化表。GRE写作官方题库高频ARGUMENT题目满分范文分享：research on chlidren in Tertia islandGRE作文官方题库ARGUMENT题目：Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist
13、, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. Recently another anthropologist, Dr. Karp, visited the group of
14、 islands that includes Tertia and used the interview-centered method to study child-rearing practices. In the interviews that Dr. Karp conducted with children living in this group of islands, the children spent much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the vill
15、age. Dr. Karp decided that Dr. Fields conclusion about Tertian village culture must be invalid. Some anthropologists recommend that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method.【满分范文赏析】It might
16、 seem logical, at first glance, to agree with the argument in Dr. Karps article that children in Tertia are actually raised by their biological parents (and perhaps even, by implication, that an observation-centered approach to anthropological study is less valid than an interview-centered one). How
17、ever, in order to fully evaluate this argument, an audience should be provided with additional evidence.【本段结构】本段采用了简明的Argument开头段结构，即CF的开头结构。段落首先概括原文的Conclusion，接下来给出开头段到正文段的过渡句，指出原文的Flaw，即其应提供额外的Evidence才能让观众对该Argument进行充分评价。【本段功能】本段作为Argument开头段，具体功能就在于发起攻击并概括原文的结论，即Tertia的孩子们的确是由他们的亲生父母所抚养的，并且以观察
18、为中心的人类学研究方法不如以面试为中心的研究方法有效。本段对原文结论的归纳为正文段中即将进行的具体攻击作铺垫。The audience should know, before deciding conclusively about the appropriate methodology for further study, if Tertia has changed significantly in the past 20 years. Dr. Field conducted his observational study 20 years ago and it is possible tha
19、t Tertia has changed significantly since then. For example, if we had evidence suggesting that, since the original study, foreigners had settled on the island and introduced a new element that affected child rearing in Tertia, it would certainly weaken Dr. Karps argument. In that case, the original
20、study could have been accurate and Dr. Karps study could be correct.【本段结构】本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第一个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。【本段功能】本段作为正文第一段，攻击原文中出现的第一个重要逻辑错误(时间上的)错误类比。在对合适的研究方法做出决定性的判断之前，观众应当被告知Tertia是否在过去的20年内发生了显著的变化。Field博士是在20年前开展了他的观察性研究，而自那时起Tertia可能发生了显著的变化。例如，我们如果有证据证明后来外
21、国人在岛上定居并引入了一种影响了Tertia的孩子抚养方式的新因素，Karp博士的论证无疑会被削弱。在这种情形下，Field博士原先的研究可能是准确的，Karp博士的研究也可能是正确的。Further, in order to fully evaluate this claim the audience needs to learn more about the interview questions that Dr. Karps team usedwhat exactly did they ask? We dont know, nor do we know what the children
22、s responses actually were. What did they say about their biological parents? The mere fact that they speak more frequently about their biological parents than they do about other adults does not mean that their biological parents had a greater role than the community did in their rearing. It would s
23、ignificantly undermine Dr. Karps argument if it turned out that the children said things like how much they missed their parents or how their parents had left them in a communal environment. Without knowing what the children said, one cannot accept the argument above without reservations.【本段结构】本段采用了
24、标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第三个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。【本段功能】本段作为正文第三段，攻击原文中出现的第三个重要逻辑错误调查类错误。为充分评价原文中的论断，观众需要就Karp博士所采用的面试问题获得更多的信息。我们既不知道他们所问问题的具体内容，也不知道孩子们的具体答案。仅仅是孩子们更经常谈到他们的亲生父母这一事实并不意味着他们的亲生父母在抚养他们的过程中比社区占有更主要的角色。如果事实证明孩子们经常说一些诸如他们多么想念父母或者他们的父母是如何把他们留在了一个集体环境中的事情的话，Karp博士的论证将被显著地削弱。在不
25、知道孩子们究竟说了些什么的情况下，我们不能无保留地接受原文的论证。It is slightly more difficult to discuss the evidence we might need in order to evaluate the more interesting claims in Dr. Karps article, namely his extension of the results of his study to a conclusion that interview-centered methods are inherently more valid than
26、observational-centered approaches in the case of study in the group of islands including Tertia. In order to fully evaluate this claim one would require more examples of interview-based and observation-based anthropological studies and we would also need to look into different study designs. Perhaps
27、 Dr. Field did not conduct an effective observational study, but other observational approaches could be effective. In order to make such grandiose claims, Dr. Karp really needs to provide a lot of additional evidence (ideally a meta-analysis of hundreds of anthropological studies).【本段结构】本段采用了标准的Arg
28、ument正文段结构，即：概括第四个逻辑错误的错误类型和其在原文中出现的位置，接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。【本段功能】本段作为正文第四段，攻击原文中出现的第四个重要逻辑错误外推类错误。在Karp博士的*中，他将自己的研究结果推广到了以面试为中心的研究方法比以观察为中心的研究方法在研究包括Tertia在内的一组岛屿时本质上更有效这一结论。为充分评价这一论断，我们需要更多的以面试为中心的人类学研究和以观察为中心的人类学研究的例子，并且我们还需要考察不同的研究设计。或许Field博士并未开展一项有效的观察式研究，而其它的观察式研究均可能是有效的。为了做出如此宏大的论断，Karp博士实在需要提供很多额外的证据。GRE写作冲刺经验
