《修改稿cover,letter模板.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《修改稿cover,letter模板.doc（24页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、修改稿cover,letter模板篇一：SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览(Cover letter,催稿信等) 一、最初投稿Cover letter Dear Editors: We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and ma
2、nuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approv
3、ed the manuscript that is enclosed. In this work, we evaluated ? (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”. The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) Name AE-mail: 2) Name BE-mail: We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we
4、 look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please dont hesitate to contact me at the address below. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 二、催稿信 Dear Prof. : Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right tim
5、e to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or
6、not? I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewers comments. Thank you very much for your consideration. Best regards! Yours sincerely, Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 三、修改稿Cover letter Dear Dr/ Pr
7、of.（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）: On behalf of my co- authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructivecomments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Pap
8、er Title”. (ID: 文章稿号). We have studied reviewers comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.
9、 We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分） List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for you
10、r letter and for the reviewers comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have mad
11、e correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewers comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (?简要列出意见?) Response: 2. Response to com
12、ment: (?简要列出意见?) Response: 。 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用： We are very sorry for our negligence of ?. We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ?. It is really true as Reviewer suggested that? We have made correction according to the Reviewers comments. We have re-written this part accor
13、ding to the Reviewers suggestion As Reviewer suggested that? Considering the Reviewers suggestion, we have ? 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见： Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “?” were corrected as “?” 2. Line 107, “?” was ad
14、ded 3. Line 129, “?” was deleted We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers
15、warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. 五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要） Dear Prof. : Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, w
16、e would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长） Dear : Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our acce
17、pted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you? I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I
18、 am very pleased to hear from you. Thank you very much for your consideration. Yours sincerely, Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 七、文章校稿信件 Dear Mr. : Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finish
19、ed the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below.Corrections: 1. In * should be * (Page *, Right column, line*) 2. In * the “*” should be “*” (Page *, Right column, line*) Answers for “author queries”: 1. *. 2. * 3. *
20、 We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 篇二：怎样写好国外期刊修改稿的Cover_Letter Cover Letter是
21、一篇文章的外衣,对国外投稿能否成功很关键,一般投稿时的Cover Letter并不是很重要,只要说明你稿件的研究方向及创新点,并声明没有在其他期刊发表过.最难写的就是Revised Manuscript中的Cover Letter,这将关系到是否录用你的稿件,或要进一步审稿.国外专家讲求的是精益求精,老外们对文章都很严谨的,一个单词哪怕是一个介词的使用都是很有考究的,因此会提出很多似乎对文章无关紧要的修改意见,但是这你要给予充分的重视.通过国外发表几篇文章后,开始一直失败,但是我没有放弃,通过总结现在将一些经验和大家分享,以免大家走很多不必要的弯路. 为了更好理解,我用我发的一篇文章作为例子来
22、说明: 这里是期刊审稿人的修改意见: Dear *, The review of your manuscript, Thermal Decomposition and Kinetics Studies on 1, 4-dinitropiperazine (DNP), submitted to Journal of Hazardous Materials has been completed. The reviewers recommend the need for minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript according to the r
23、eviewers' comments attached, and re-submit to me your revised version of the manuscript including an itemized response to each reviewer's comments. Please submit your revised submission before Jul 11, 2007. I will then begin the re-review process. Please note that revised manuscripts will be
24、 sent for review because revising a manuscript does not automatically mean it will be accepted for publication. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled Submissions Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there. Please
25、ensure that the article conforms to the format of the Journal. In particular make sure that all the articles in your references have titles included. The Journal Guide for Authors is available on the Journal homepage/locate/hazmat When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you uploa
26、d the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. Once again, thank you for your interest in Journal of H
27、azardous Materials. Yours sincerely, Merv Fingas, PhD Editor Journal of Hazardous Materials Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper reports on the thermal decomposition and kinetics of DNP. It is a welcome addition to the literature and appectable for publication after some revision: (i) Ple
28、ase provide large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP. (ii) Please assign ALL IR bands of Fig. 5 Reviewer #2: authors have carried out work on the thermal analysis of the dinitropiperazine. The new information reported in the paper is scanty. The large amount
29、of data has been already reported by the several researchers on the thermal analysis of dinitropiperazine (See the reference section of the paper and also reviewer has done the scopus search). The only new information reported in this paper is of theT-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different
30、pressures, which may adds on to the existing scientific data base. There is not much novelty in the reported work. The Table 1 and figure 1 need to be deleted from the paper since it is already well reported in the literature. Table 2 and figure 3 gives the same information. Authors are requested to
31、 delete Table 2 and the same information may be explained in the results and discussion part of the paper. May i also kindly request authors to update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper using Chemical abstracts on disk (CA on CD) data base. The quality and c
32、larity of the figures in the paper need to be improved. English need to be improved. The paper is recommended for short communication after the minor revision. Reviewer #3: The paper is okay in terms of contents.However,since it has been written by a Chinese, the english is very poor and as such req
33、uires a lot of corrections and editing by your team. The authors have used ozawa and Kissenger methods to find out activation energy.However,they have given data for activation energy by ozawa method only under 3.4 thermal decomposition kinetics).The data for Eo by Kissenger methods should also be i
34、ncluded in the paper.Also,captions of Figs 1,3 &5 are missing. Reviewer #4: This paper is promising but could be improved by better kinetic analysis. 1. Kissinger's method is OK as a first approximation, but Friedman's method is the best isoconversional method. Even Ozawa has abandoned h
35、is method in favor of Friedman's. 2. The method of comparing a large number of kinetic models against data at a single heating rate (page 5) is invalid, discredited, and should not be published. This issue has been discussed in several papers by Vyzovkin and in a international kinetic study publ
36、ished by Brown et al, Thermochemica Acta 355, 125-143, 2000, and following papers. Consequently, there is no real evidence presented that the equation is first-order. In fact, from my studies of energetic materials, including RDX and HMX, I would have thought that nucleation-growth kinetics would be
37、 most appropriate. However, I would have to do a more rigorous kinetic analysis of the data to know for sure. 3. The best way to judge a kinetic model is how it compares with data at multiple heating rates (using a single set of parameters). Such a comparison is not present in this paper, so it is d
38、ifficult to judge the validity of the kinetic parameters. 4. The author's discussion of HMX kinetics is good in some respects but out of date in others. More recent papers by multiple institutions place the activation energy for HMX closer to 150 kJ/mol. A commonly cited paper on this is by Wigh
39、t and Vyazovkin, Ann Rev Phys Chem 48, 119, 1997. A more recent but harder paper to get is by Burnham and Weese in the proceedings of the 2005 ICT conference. Henson has published a correlation in the detonation symposium showing that explosion times scale with an activation energy of about 150 kJ/m
40、ol. Active workers in energetic materials should have access to these materials. 看完了这个,是不是会觉得很头疼,是的老外就是这么认真.要求很具体仔细,审稿细致深入.下面就是看你怎么样回复这篇审稿意见了.我回复后的第三天就收到论文录用通知,估计他们没有再次送给审稿专家重审.因为我的Cover Letter他很满意,我是这样写的: Dear *, My manuscript, *（论文题目）, was revised according to the reviewers' comments, and the
41、itemized response to each reviewers comments is attached. Many thanks for your suggestion. I am so sorry to bring you so much trouble because of our careless. Correspondence and phone calls about this paper should be directed to *（作者） at the following address，phone and e-mail： Address: * Tel.: * Fax
42、:* E-mail: * Thanks very much again for your attention to our paperOnce again, thank you for your help to our paper processing. Yours sincerely， * For your guidance, itemized response to each reviewers comments is appended below. ? Dear reviewer #1: (i) Suhithi M. Peiris, Richard, etc. (J. Phys. Che
43、m. A, 104 (39), 8898 -8907, 2000. 10.1021) had already reported large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP. (ii) We assigned all IR bands of Fig.5 (now change to fig.8). (iii) Because of the IR study had been reported, the IR spectra (fig.1) was deleted form th
44、e paper. Anyway, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice. ? Dear reviewer #2:篇三：SCI 投稿Cover letter模板大全 SCI 投稿Cover letter模板大全 1. 第一次投稿Cover letter：主要任务是介绍文章主要创新以及声 明没有一稿多投 Dear Editors: We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be conside
45、red for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previousl
46、y, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed. In this work, we evaluated (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”. The following is a list of possible reviewers for your con
47、sideration: 1) Name AE-mail: 2) Name BE-mail: We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please dont hesitate to contact me at the address below. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 2. 催稿信：询问稿件处理到声明步骤 Dear Prof. : Sorry for disturb
