《采矿对煤层底板断层活化影响的数值模拟毕业论文外文翻译.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《采矿对煤层底板断层活化影响的数值模拟毕业论文外文翻译.doc（13页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、英文原文Numerical Simulation of Coal Floor Fault Activation Influenced by Mining WANG Lian-guo,MIAO Xie-xingSchool of Sciences,China University of Mining&Technology,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221008,ChinaAbstract:By means of the numerical simulation software ANSYS,the activation regularity of coal floor faults caus
2、ed by mining is simulated.The results indicate that the variation in horizontal,vertical and shear stresses,as well as the horizontal and vertical displacements in the upper and the lower fault blocks at the workface are almost identical.Influenced by mining of the floor rock,there are stress releas
3、ing and stress rising areas at the upper part and at the footwall of the fault.The distribution of stress is influenced by the fault so that the stress isolines are staggered by the fault face and the stress is focused on the rock seam around the two ends of the fault.But the influence in fault acti
4、vation on the upper or the lower fault blocks of the workface is markedly different.When the workface is on the footwall of the fault,there is a horizontal tension stress area on the upper part of the fault;when the workface is on the upper part of the fault,it has a horizontal compressive stress ar
5、ea on the lower fault block.When the workface is at the lower fault block,the maximum vertical displacement is 5 times larger then when the workface is on the upper fault block,which greatly increases the chance of a fatal inrush of water from the coal floor.Key words:mining;fault activation;simulat
6、ion1 IntroductionIn this paper we attempt to appraise the activation regularity and deformation of coal floor faults caused by mining.Damage mechanisms of rock around coal floor faults are described from different aspects and in different contexts110.Descriptions can,to some extent,intensify our und
7、erstanding of coal floor fault activation caused by mining.However, looking at the effect of these views,a mechanical analysis cannot achieve the purpose of pictures and clarity.For a more profound understanding of the regularity of fault activation caused by mining at the workface,we use computers
8、to make numerical simulations and obtain a series of valuable conclusions. 2 Numerical Calculation of Model FormationConsidering the different fault activations influenced by the workface on the upper and lower fault blocks,we build two calculation models according to the state of the plane strain.F
9、ig.1 is a calculation model(Model)of the workface on the lower fault block,showing the loading on the top of the terrane according to the distributional characteristics11 of mine pressure.Given the conditions of mining technology of the Qinan mine,the terrane 70 m fore- and-aft the workface and 30 m
10、 deep under the coal floor is simulated.The lithology of the floor is Berea sandstone and the elastic modulus E=1.09104MPa,the Poissons ratio=0.34,the cohesion C=2.94MPa,the internal friction angle=35 and the density=2.5 kN/m3.The calculation model of the workface on the upper part of the fault(Mode
11、l)is the same as that of Modelexcept that the abutment pressure ahead of the workface is on the upper part of the fault.3 Numerical Simulation Results and AnalysisFor both models,the isoline graphs of horizontal, vertical and shear stresses as well as the horizontal and vertical displacements of mod
12、elsandhave been calculated and are plotted respectively as Figs.23. 3.1 Distribution characteristics of horizontal stressesInfluenced by mining of the coal floor rock, there are horizontal stress releasing areas and rising areas at the upper part and at the footwall of the fault. The distribution of
13、 horizontal stresses is influenced by the fault and it is obvious that the stress isolines are staggered by the fault face and the stress is concentrated on the rock seam around the two ends of the fault. In model I,stress is concentrated at the shallow part of the orebody at the footwall of the fau
14、lt.The horizontal stress is 6.410 MPa.The horizontal stress under the fault face is 3.14.9 MPa.The lower part of mined-out areas on the lower fault block releases pressure,and may even turn to tension stress of about 0.5 MPa.But in the deeper part,the horizontal stress turns to compressive stress an
15、d the value increases gradually. In model,the stress is concentrated at the lower part of the orebody on the lower fault block and the horizontal stress becomes 14.627.5 MPa.The horizontal stress under the fault face is 4.948.16 MPa.The lower part of the mined-out areas at the fault footwall release
16、s pressure;the horizontal stress is 4.94 MPa. 3.2 Distributional characteristics of vertical stressesThe distributions of vertical stresses are also influenced by faults.The stress isolines are staggered by the fault face.The stress is focused on the rock seam round the two ends of the fault. In mod
17、el I,the stress is concentrated at the lower part of the orebody on the lower fault block.When the depth increases,the extent of the stress concentration in the rock under the coal bed decreases.The vertical stresses of the rock under the coal bed step down from 29.8 MPa to 18.7 MPa.The extent of th
18、e release at the upper part of mined-out areas reduces gradually and the vertical stresses increase from 1.5 MPa to 8.6 MPa.The vertical stresses at the footwall of the fault face increase from 8.6 MPa to 15.4 MPa. In model,the stress is concentrated at the lower part of the orebody on the lower fau
19、lt block. When the depth increased,the concentration of stress in the rock under the coal bed decreased.The vertical stresses of the rock under the coal bed step down from 47.1 MPa to 13.5 MPa.The extent of the release of the footwall mined-out areas gradually reduces and the vertical stresses incre
20、ase from 2.33 MPa to 7.92 MPa.The vertical stress at the footwall of fault face is 13.5 MPa.3.3 Distributional characteristics of shear stressesThe distribution of shear stresses at the upper part and the footwall of the fault are obviously different.The distributional characteristics of shear stres
21、s isolines are in conflict and the shear stresses are concentrated at the two ends of the fault.Inmodel,the stresses under the fault face evolve from compressive shear stress to tension shear stress.Its value ranges from5.4 MPa to0.3 MPa (the minus sign means compressive stress and the positive sign
22、 means tension stress).The tension at the upper fault block face of the shear stress area has a value of 0.3 MPa in the shallow part which gradually increases to 2.56 MPa in the deeper part. In model,the stress above the fault face changed from tension shear stress to compressive shear stress and th
23、e values ranged from6.6 MPa to 11.6 MPa (again,the minus sign means compressive stress and the positive sign tension stress).The upper part of the fault face is a tension shear stress area and the value gradually reduces from 4.99 MPa to 0.57 MPa. 3.4 Horizontal displacement In model,the horizontal
24、compressive displacement on the lower fault block is small;its value is 0.35.6 mm.The horizontal compressive displacement at the fault footwall is large.The maximum value is 42.6 mm,but this falls gradually to 0.3 mm with increasing depth. In model,the horizontal tension displacement of the coal flo
25、or at the upper part of the fault ranges from 1.3 mm to 10.9 mm.The deep horizontal compressive displacement is small,ranging from 0.3 mm to 1.9 mm.The horizontal tension displacement at the footwall of the fault is between 1.3 and 10.9 mm.3.5 Vertical displacementJust as in the foregoing descriptio
26、n,during mining,vertical stresses loading on the rock floor will change.At a time,from the front of the coal wall to the mined-out area,advancing in the direction along the workface supporting pressure areas,release pressure areas and stress resuming areas will arise.Related to this development,the
27、rock of the coal floor may become a compressive area,an expanding area and a re-compressive area.The displacement of the rock on the coal floor reduces with increasing depth.In model,the displacement of the compressive area at the fault footwall reduces from 21.4 mm in the shallow end to 8.2 mm in t
28、he deep end and the displacement of the expanding area in upper part reduces from 84 mm to 4.9 mm going from the shallow to the deep end. In model,the displacement of the compressive area at the fault footwall reduces from 34.17 mm at the shallow end to 3.88 mm at the deep end and the displacement o
29、f the expanding area in the upper part reduces from 14.29 mm at the shallow part to 2.17 mm in the deeper part. 4 ConclusionsGiven the calculations in our analysis,the following inferences can be drawn:1)Influenced by mining of the floor rock,horizontal stress releasing areas and rising areas at the
30、 upper part and at the footwall of the fault develop. The distributions of horizontal stresses are influenced by the fault as indicated by the stress isolines which are staggered at the fault face and the stress is focused on the rock seam around the two ends of the fault.2)The distribution of verti
31、cal stresses are also influenced by the fault that as shown by the stress isolines,staggered at the fault face and the stress is concentrated at the rock seam around the two ends of the fault.3)The distribution of shear stresses at the upper part and the footwall of the fault are also obviously diff
32、erent.The shear stresses concentrate at the two ends of the fault.4)When the workface is at the footwall of the fault,there is a horizontal tension stress area on the upper part of the fault;when the workface is on the upper part of the fault,it has a horizontal compressive stress area at the lower
33、fault block. 5)When the workface is on the lower fault block,the maximum vertical displacement is 5 times larger than that at the upper fault block,which very much increases the chance of a fatal inrush of water from the coal floor.References1Gao Y F,Shi L Q,Lou H J,et al.Water-Inrush Regularity and
34、 Water-Inrush Preferred Plane of Coal Floor.Xuzhou:China University of Mining&Technology Publishing House,1999.(In Chinese)2Qian M G,Miao X X,XU J L.The Key Strata Theory of Controlling the Rock Seam.Xuzhou:China University of Mining &Technology Publishing House,2000.(In Chinese)3Zhang J C,Zhang Y Z
35、,Liu T Q.The Seepage Flow in Rock and the Water Inrush in Coal Floor.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1997.(In Chinese)4Wang L G,Song Y.The Non-Linear Characteristic and the Forecast of Water Inrush from Coal Floor.Beijing:Coal Industry Press,2001.(In Chinese)5Gong S G.The Basic Application and E
36、xample Analysis of ANSYS.Beijing:Machine Press,2003.(In Chinese)6Li H Y,Zhou T P,Liu X X.The Tutorial of Engineering Application of ANSYS.Beijing:China Railway Press,2003.(In Chinese)7Wang L G,Song Y.A model to risk assessment for mine water-inrush.Journal of Engineering Geology,2001,09(02):158163.8
37、Miao X X,Lu A H,Mao X B,et al.Numerical simulation for roadways in swelling rock under coupling function of water and ground pressure.Journal of China University of Mining&Technolog,2002,12(2):121125.9Wang L G,Bi S J,Song Y.Numerical simulation research on law of deformation and breakage of coal flo
38、or.Group Pressure and Strate Control,2004,(4):3537.(In Chinese)10Wang L G,Song Y,Miao X X.Study on prediction of water-inrush from coal floor based on cusp catastrophic model.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2003,22(4):573577.11Jiang J Q.The Stress and the Movement of the Rock Aroun
39、d the Stope.Beijing:Coal Industry Press,1997.(In Chinese)中文译文采矿对煤层底板断层活化影响的数值模拟王连国，缪协兴中国矿业大学，理学院，中国，江苏，徐州221008 摘要：利用数值模拟软件ANSYS ，模拟采矿引起的底板断层活化规律。结果表明，工作面在断层上盘和下盘时，横向、纵向和剪应力的变化，以及水平和垂直位移几乎一样的。因采矿地面岩石影响，在断层的上盘和下盘有应力降低和压力上升的地区。应力分布的影响，这样的断层的压力等值线的交错面临的过失和强调的是集中在岩层周围的两端。但是断层的影响，活化的上部或下部断块的工作面明显不同.当工作面在
40、断层的下盘，有一个横向拉应力区的在断层的上盘;当工作面是在断层上盘，它有一个压应力水平较低的地区的工作面断层块。当工作面在断层下盘，最大垂直位移比工作面在断层上盘大5倍，这样极大地增大致命的底板突水机会。关键词：采矿;断层活化;模拟1简介在本文中，我们试图评价受煤层底板的断层活化规律和变形。损害机制所造成的岩石煤层底板断层周围描述来自不同方面和在不同情况。说明可以在一定程度上加强我们的理解采矿影响煤层底板断层活化.然而，从这些观点的考虑，机械分析无法实现的预期的目的.为了更深刻的理解受工作面影响断层活化规律，我们使用计算机，从而使数值模拟试验，并获得了一系列有价值的结论。2数值计算模型的形成考
41、虑到工作面在断层上下盘位子不同的影响断层活化，我们建立两个数字模型通过不同拉伸状态.图1是一个数值模型（模型）的工作面下盘，显示的负荷上方的岩层根据矿山压力的分布特征.基于现在采矿技术学条件祁南煤矿，模拟工作面前70米和纵向的和30米深的煤层底板.底板的岩性是贝雷亚砂岩的弹性模量E = 1.09 104MPa时，泊松比 = 0.34 ，凝聚力 = 2.94MPa时，内摩擦角 = 35和容重 = 2.5 kN/m3。工作面在断层上盘数值模型（模式 ）和模型是一样的，但前面的支承压力是在工作面是在断层上盘的情况下。图1 计算模型3数值模拟结果与分析（一）等值的水平应力（二）等值线垂直应力（三）剪应
42、力等值线（四）等值线水平位移（五）垂直位移等值线图2 模型的计算结果对于这两种模型，等值线图的水平，纵向和剪应力以及横向和垂直位移的模型 ， 计算和绘制分别为图2-3。3.1横向应力分布特征（一）等值的水平应力（二）等值线垂直应力（三）剪应力等值线（四）等值线水平位移（五）垂直位移等值线图3 模型的计算结果 受开采的煤层底板岩石影响，有水平应力降低区域和不断上升的断层上盘。受断层影响分配的横向应力，很明显，应力等值线是错开的断层所面临的压力是聚集在断层岩层周围的两端。在模型，强调的是集中在浅水部分矿体上盘.水平应力是6.4-10 MPa. 在断层面得水平应力3.1至4.9MPa。下部采空区的低
43、断块降低压力，甚至可能反过来向拉应力约0.5 MPa。在更深的部分，水平应力和压应力轮流逐渐增加。在模式 ，应力集中在下部矿体低断块和横向应力成为14.6-27.5 MPa。水平应力下的断裂面是4.94-8.16MPa。下部采空区的断层降低压力;横向应力是4.94MPa。3.2垂直应力分布特征待添加的隐藏文字内容3垂直应力分布也受到断层的影响。压力等值线的交错由断层面.应力集中在煤层下的断层两端。在模型中，应力是集中在较低的部分矿体低断层。当深度的增加，度在岩石下的应力聚集程降低.垂直应力条件下岩石煤层步骤从29.8MPa的18.7 MPa.The程度释放在上部采空区减少逐步和垂直应力增加1.
44、5强度为8.6 MPa.The垂直强调在盘故障面对增加8.6MPa至15.4MPa。在模式 ，应力集中在下部矿体低断块。当深度增加，煤床下的岩石垂直应力集中在47.1 MPa到13.5 MPa.在断层下盘垂直应力增长从2.33 MPa提高7.92 MPa.垂直应力在断层下盘为13.5 MPa。3.3剪应力的分布特征在断层上下盘的剪切应力的分布式明显不同的，剪切应力等值线是冲突的，和集中在断层两端剪切应力相比。模型 ，压力下面临断层演变从压剪应力的张应力。值范围从- 5.4MPa至-0.3MPa（减号指压应力和积极的迹象意味着拉应力） 。在上断块面的张应力对剪应力地区有价值0.3MPa的浅层部分
45、，逐步提高到2.56MPa的更深的一部分。在模式的应力面对上述故障从紧张到压剪应力剪应力和价值不等， 6.6MPa，以-11.6MPa（再次，减号指压压力和积极的迹象拉应力）。上部部分断裂面是一个紧张剪应力区和逐步降低的价值从4.99至0.57MPa。3.4水平位移模型，横向压缩病安置低断块小，它的价值是0.3-5.6 mm.横向压缩病安置在断层下盘是。最大值为四十二点六毫米，但逐渐下降至0.3毫米日益深入。在模式 ，紧张的横向位移煤炭楼的上半部分的故障范围从1.3mm到9.10mm.深横向压缩位移小，范围从0.3毫米1.9 mm.横向位移紧张盘故障是1.3和10.9毫米。3.5垂直位移正如在
46、上述的描述，在采矿，垂直应力装载的岩石上改变.有时，从煤壁前面到采空区，推进方向沿支撑的工作面压力区，降低工作压力和垂直压力恢复地区将上升.重诉这一发展，岩层的煤层底板可能成为压区，扩大面积和重新压缩面积位移岩石上的煤层底板降低日益深入。模型 ，压缩位移在断层下盘减少21.4毫米，在浅端8.2mm深底的扩大面积减少上部从84毫米到4.9mm从浅到深部。在模式 ，压缩位移在减少断层下盘在从34.17mm浅端部3.88mm在底和深的扩大面积的上半部分减少从14.28在浅层部分2.17mm的更深一部分。4结论鉴于我们的分析计算，可以得出以下推论：1）受采矿地面岩石，横向应力释放领域和不断上升的地区上
47、半部分，并在盘故障发展。分布横向应力的影响的过失所显示的压力等值线是错开的故障面临的应力集中对岩层周围的两端故障。2）垂直分布也强调受故障，由于所表现出的压力等值线，交错在故障面对的压力是集中在岩层周围的两端故障。3）剪应力分布的上限部分和下盘的故障也明显不同，剪应力集中在两个两端的故障。4）当工作面处于盘的故障，有一个横向拉应力区上部断裂;当工作面于上半部分的故障，它有一个横向压缩应力区在较低断块。5）当工作面是低故障块，最大垂直位移的5倍大于在上断块，这非常多增加了一个致命的突水从煤层底板。参考文献1 Gao Y F,Shi L Q,Lou H J等.煤层底板突水突规律与防治.徐州 ：中国
48、矿业大学出版社， 1999 。 2钱鸣高，缪协兴 ，岩层控制的关键层理论.徐州 ：中国矿业大学出版社， 2000 。 3 Zhang J C,Zhang Y Z,Liu T Q.渗流在岩石和在煤矿底板突水.北京 ：地质出版， 1997年。 4王连国，宋扬，煤矿底板突水的非线性特性及预测.北京 ：煤炭工业出版社， 2001年。 5 Gong S G，基本应用与实例分析ANSYS.北京 ：机械工业出版社， 2003 。 6 Li H Y,Zhou T P,Liu X X，ANSYS应用工程辅导.北京 ：中国铁道出版社， 2003 。 7王连国，宋元，矿井突水风险评估模型.工程地质学报， 2001,09 （ 02 ） ：158-163 。8 缪协兴,卢爱红,茅献彪，数值仿真膨胀岩巷道耦合作用下的水和地面压力.中国矿业大学学报， 2002,12（ 2 ）:121 - 125 。9王连国，毕善军，宋扬，研究煤矿底板的变形与断裂规律数值模拟.压山压力与顶板管理， 2004 ，（ 4 ） :35 - 37 。 10王连国，宋扬，缪协兴，基于尖点灾难性煤层底板突水模型研究.中国岩石力学与工程杂志， 2003,22 （ 4 ）:573 - 577 。11 Jiang J Q，回采工作面围岩运动和应力.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1997年。
