《2022年度江苏省知识产权十大典型案件.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年度江苏省知识产权十大典型案件.docx（37页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、CONTENTQ稳健医疗用品股份有限公司与苏州稳健医疗用品有限公司、苏n州航伟包装有限公司、滑某侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案26WinnerMedicalCo.Lld.v.SuzhouWinnerMedicalCdud.SuzhouHangWeiPackagingCo.Ltd.andHuaXXrCaseofDisputeoverTrademarkInfingementandUnfarCompetition项维仁与李某罡、姑苏区探花玉雕工作室著作权侵权纠案XangWeCflvliXXQangandCubuDsldYGgJadeCarMngSluorCascdDfeptfeOverCqhIMMaK
2、M30f|H江苏省长丰医疗实业有限公司等企业遭遇美国，37帧”案Je11(sChanglongMedcalhndistyCoJdetal.CsodUS.Sccc397lvosgoCC南通海关查获跨境电商侵犯2022北京冬奥会(冬残奥会)特IIH殊标志专有权钥匙扣案CaseofInlringementonExclusiveRightsofSpeciaJSymbolso1则”2022OlympicWinterGaEeS(ParatymPiCWinterGamesJinCross-BorderE-CommercezNantongCustomsSeaedIntfinglngKeyChains38in被
3、告人王颖假冒注册商标罪案QCc*Corlw1YnWwUdaDxrtVfrX，目录m南京恒生制药有限公司与南京市知识产权局、拜耳知识产权有限责任公司专利行政裁决纠纷NanjingHencerPharmaceuticalCo.tdvNaningMunicipaJIntellectualPropertyOficeandBayerIntellectualPropertyGmbHiCaseofDisputeoverAdministrathveDecisiononPatent7Q无锡中工热控科技有限公司、陆某昌、司某律、徐某侵犯商业秘密案mmrTechnologyCo.Ltd.LuXXcang.SiXXI
4、uandXuXXC吕某龙等侵犯冬奥会吉祥物“冰城蛾著作权案15fH陈某辉等被告人侵犯著作权罪案CaSeOfCoPyriQhtInfrinaetneniRelatedIoChenXXhUietal18AE德株产业与发展有限责任两合公司、蹒国际有限公司、瞬IO(太仓)家具科技有限公司诉德禄家具(上海)有限公司、德禄家具(南通)有限公司等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案RaumplusBesrtzundEntwicWungs-GmbHACo.KG.,raumpusGmbHandDelU(Taicang)FumitureTechnologyCo.Ltd.v.DeluFumiture(Shanghai)Co
5、.Ud.DeluFumiure(Nantong)Co-Lldetal：CaSeofOsputeoverTfadenwkInfringementadUnfairCompettionno本案是涉及专利法BOIar例外条款适用的典型案例，对Bolar例外条款作了细化解释，明确了适用条件以及许诺销售行为不属于专利法关于药品和医疗器械行政审批的侵权免责情形（BOIar例外）。判决指出，在适用专利法关于药品和医疗器械行政审批例外的规定时，要注意平衡专利权人和仿制药企之间的利益，既要保障社会公众在专利权届满后及时获得价格低廉的药品和医疗器械，也要避免削弱对专利权人合法权益的保护，对于鼓励医药领域发明创造、维
6、护医药市场创新发展具有积极指引作用。Na11jingIIencerPharmaceuticalCo.L(d.v.NanjingMunicipalInteIIectUiiIPropertyOf11ceandBayerIntellectualPropertyGmhH:CaseOfDiSDUtCncrAdminiMnHivcDCCiSiUfIUnPakntBayerIntellectualPropertyGmbH(hereinafterreferredtoasuBaye)istheholderoftheinventionpatentsubstitutedOxazolidinonesandtheiru
7、seinthefieldofbloodcoagulation.ThedefendantNanjingHencerPharmaceuticalCo.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredtoasHenceQdisplayediiRivaroxabanTabltsandRivaroxabanTabletAPIsonitsofficialwebsiteandinrelevantexhibitions,withpicturesofpackagingboxesandbottlesbearingtheregisteredtrademarkofHencer-Believingthattheafo
8、resaidproductsthatHencerofferedforsalefellintothescopeofprotectionofthepatentinvolvedandconstitutedapatentinfringement,Bayerfiledarequestforresolvingthedisputeoverpatentintringement.NanjingIntellectualPropertyOficerenderedanadministrativedecision,orderingHencertodeletetheinfringingpropagandainformat
9、iononitsOffiCialwebsiteandceasetheofferforsale.Hencerrefusedtoacceptthedecision,asitbelievedthatitsdisplayoftheproductsinvolvedwasatargetedadvertisingfortheenterprisesplanningtodevelopgenericdrugsofrivaroxaban,andtheproductsinvolvedwereinanonsaleablestate,thusitsactsdidnotconstituteanofferforsale.Mo
10、reover.itmentionedBayerastheoriginaldrugoftheproductsinvolved,andtherewasBolarprovisionofthepatentlawonthedisplayboards.Hence,Hencersactsdidnotconstituteapatentinfringementduetocompliancewiththeprovisionsofthepatentlawonexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevices,eveni
11、ftheyconstitutedanofferforsale.Therefore1Hencerfiledanadministrativeactionwiththecourt.南京恒生制药有限公司与南京市知识产权局、拜耳知识产权有Ol限责任公司专利行政裁决纠纷案拜耳知识产权有限责任公司（以下简称拜耳公司）系“取代的嗯理烷酮和其在血液凝固领域中的应用”的发明专利权利人。被诉侵权的南京恒生制药有限公司（以下简称恒生公司）在其官网和相关展会上展示“利伐沙班片”“利伐沙班片原料药”，配有包装盒、包装瓶图片并印制有恒生公司的注册商标。拜耳公司认为该公司许诺销售的上述产品落入涉案专利权的保护范围，构成专利侵
12、权，提出专利侵权纠纷处理请求。南京市知识产权局作出行政裁决，责令恒生公司删除官方网站上侵权宣传信息，停止许诺销售行为。该公司不服，认为其展示涉案产品的行为属于针对计划开发利伐沙班仿制药企业的定向投送，涉案产品并未处于可以销售的状态，因此不构成许诺销售。而且，其注明了涉案产品的原研药公司为拜耳公司，展板上也印有专利法Bolar例外的相关条款，即使构成许诺销售，其行为也符合专利法关于药品和医疗器械行政审批例外的规定，不构成专利侵权，故向法院提起行政诉讼。法院认为，许诺销售行为既可以针对特定对象，也可以针对不特定对象；既可以是发出邀约，也可以是发出要约遨请。恒生公司通过网站展会向不特定对象作出销售涉
13、案产品的意思表示明确具体，构成许诺销售行为。关于许诺销售是否属于药品和医疗器械行政审批例外，应从抗辨主体及其具体行为等方面进行分析认定。苜先.药不和医疗器械行政审批例外条款包含两种类型的主体，一是为了获得仿制药品和医疗器械行政审批所需要的信息而实施专利的行为人；二是为该行为人专门实施专利的行为人。恒生公司既不是申请利伐沙班药品需要迸行行政审批的主体.也没有事实表明其仅向准备申请注册利伐沙班产品的特定企业进行了宣传，不符合药品和医疗器械行政审批例外抗辩的主体条件.其次，药品和医疗器械行政审批例外条款所调整的行为是，为提供行政审批所需要的信息，为自己申请行政审批而实施“制造、使用、进口”行为，以及
14、专门为前一主体申请行政审批而实施“制造、进口行为，均不包括许诺销售行为。恒生公司未经许可实施不属于药品和医疗器械行政审批例外情形的许诺销售行为，可能导致不特定对推迟向专利权人购买专利产品等后果，实质上削弱对专利权人合法权益的保护。据此，一审法院判决驳回恒生公司诉讼请求。当事人不服上诉，最高法院二审维持。（本案由江苏省高级人民法院省知识产权局提供）/，IThecourtheldthatanofferforsalecanbeaimedateitherspecificobjectsorunspecificobjects,andcanbeeitheranofferoraninvitationforof
15、fer.InthisCase1Hencershowedaclearandspecificintentiontoselltheproductsinvolvedtounspecificobjectsthroughitswebsiteandexhibitions,constitutinganofferforsale.Ajudgementastowhetherexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevicesapplytoanofferforsaleshallbemadebyanalyzingthedef
16、endantanditsspecificacts.Firstofall,exemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevicescovertwotypesofSubjectsjncludingperpetratorsengagedinpatentexploitationinordertoobtaintheinformationneededforadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofgenericdrugsandmedicaldevicesandactorsassig
17、nedbytheperpetratorsforpatentexploitation.Hencerisnotasubjectthatissubjecttoadministrativeexaminationandapprovalinapplyingforrivaroxabandrugs,andthereisnoevidencetoshowthatitonlypublicizedtheproductsinvolvedtospecificenterprisesplanningtoapplyforregistrationofrivaroxabanproducts.Therefore,Hencercoul
18、dnotbedeterminedasasubjectofdefenseforexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevices.Second,theactsregulatedbyexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevicesareactsofmanufacture,useandimportforprovidinginformationneededforadministrativeexaminati
19、onandapprovalandforownapplicationforadministrativeexaminationandapproval,andactsofmanufactureandimportfortheapplicationforadministrativeexaminationandapprovalbytheformersubject,whichdonotincludeoffersforsale.Hencer,sofferforsalewithoutpermission,towhichexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandappro
20、valofdrugsandmedicaldevicesdonotapply,mayleadtoadelayofunspecificobjectsinpurchasingpatentedproductsfromthepatentee,andsubstantiallyweakentheprotectionforthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofthepatentee.Accordingly,thecourtoffirstinstancedismissedallclaimsofHencerXater1Hencerfiledanappealagainstthefirst
21、-instancejudgment,andtheSupremeCourtmadeasecondinstancejudgment,rulingthattheoriginaljudgmentshallbemaintained.(ThiscaseisprovidedbyJiangsuHighPeoplesCourt,andtheIntellectualPropertyOfficeofJiangsuProvince)IAnaIVSiSandCOmmemThiscaseisatypicalcaseinvolvingtheapplicationoftheBolarexceptioninthepatentl
22、aw.ltprovidesadetailedexplanationoftheBolarexception,andclarifiestheapplicableconditionsoftheBolarexceptionandthefactthatexemptionsfromadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevicesinthepatentlaw(Bolarexception)donotapplytoanofferforsale.Thejudgmentheldthatwhenapplyingtheprovisionsofth
23、epatentlawonexemptionsfromtheadministrativeexaminationandapprovalofdrugsandmedicaldevices,anindividualorentitymustpayattentiontobalancingtheinterestsbetweenthepatenteeandgenericdrugcompanies,notonlytoensurethatthepubliccanhaveaccesstolow-priceddrugsandmedicaldevicespromptlyaftertheexpirationofpatent
24、rights,butalsotoavoidweakeningtheprotectionforthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofthepatentee.Thiscaseplaysapositiveguidingroleinencouragingpharmaceuticalinventionsandmaintainingtheinnovationanddevelopmentofthepharmaceuticalmarket.商业秘密罪。中工公司与司某律系共同犯罪。陆某门、司某律、徐某在犯罪中均起主要作用，均系主犯,均应经照其所参与的全部犯罪处罚。根据被告单位及各被告
25、人的犯罪情节，判决认定中工公司犯侵犯商业秘密罪，判处罚金人民币450万元；陆某昌、司某律、徐某犯侵犯商业秘密罪，判处有期徒刑三年六个月至三年不等并处罚金等。（本案由江苏省高级人民法院省检察院,省市场监督管理局提供）本案是适用刑法修正案（十一）的典型案例。修正案修改了侵犯商业秘密罪的入罪标准，将研J法第219条中”给商业秘密的权利人造成重大损失”修改为“情节严重”。如何认定“情节严重”“情节特别严重”，司法解释尚未出台。判决明确，给受害人造成重大损失仍是衡量侵犯商业秘密罪“情节严重”等的重要因素，从而认定被告单位及被告人均构成侵犯商业秘密罪，对被告单位判处罚金人民币450万元，对各被告人分别判处
26、有期徒刑并处罚金。同时，被告单位与受害单位员工内外勾结侵犯技术秘密和经营秘密，情节恶劣。法院判决体现了从严打击知识产权犯罪的决心，有利于维护公平竞争的市场秩序，激励市场主体创新热情。检察机关针对被害单位保密制度漏洞制发检察建议书.被害单位采纳并予以整改后成为知识产权保护示范点。CaseofInfringementnTradeSecretsRelatedtoVVuxiZhonggongThermalControlTechnologyCo.,Ltd.,LuXXchang,SiXXluandXuXXISuzhouHuikeEquipmentCo.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredto
27、as“Huike)hastechnicalinformationandbusinessinformationunknowntothepublic,andhasformulatedregulationssuchasdocumentmanagementregulationsandconfidentialityregulations,accordingtowhichitssecretsaredividedintothreesecuritylevelsbycontent:topsecret,secretandconfidential.lthasspecificpersonsresponsiblefor
28、theconfidentialityoftheproduction,receipt1distribution,use,reproduction,extraction,preservationanddestructionofitssecrets,includingdocuments,materialsandotheritems,aswellasthesecretsstored,processedandtransmittedbythecomputertechnology,andtakesvariousnfidentialitymeasuresintermsofsecretusesandplaces
29、.no无锡中工热控科技有限公司、陆某昌、司某律、徐某侵犯商业uz苏州汇科机电设备有限公司（以下简称汇科公司）拥有不为公众所知悉的技术信息、经营信息,分别建立了文件管三制度保密制度等制度规范，剧&内容不同，把公司臧密划分为绝密、机密、秘密三个等级，将属于公司秘密的文件、资料和其他物品的制作、4攵发、使用、豆制、摘抄、保存、销毁以及采用电脑技术存取处理,传递的公司秘密设置专人负责保密，并且在相关秘密的使用以及场所等方面，采取了不同的保密措施。2000年，陆某昌入职汇科公司，后任售后经理；2011年，司某律入眠匚科公司，任网络管理员。陆某昌、司某律入职后与汇科公司分别签署了保密及竞业禁止协议，汇科公
30、司也按月分别向其支付了保密津贴。无锡中工热控科技有限公司（以下简称中工公司）2017年3月成立后，因缺乏相关技术人才，不断以高薪或入股等方式，从汇科公司招揽人才。经陆某昌介绍，中工公司法定代表人徐某联系司某律，承诺许以好处费，引诱司某律利用职务上的便利，向中工公司提供汇科公司的高端电子元件气品烧成炉设计图等秘密资料。此后，司某律将汇科公司服务器中多份采取保密措施、载有技术信息的图纸等资料解密后拷贝给中工公司徐某，徐某向司某律支付人民币8万元及价值人民币8万元的中工公司2%的股份作为好处费。另外，司某律以解密费名义向徐某收取人民币6.8万元。2018年2月，陆某昌从汇科公司离职后加入中工公司担任
31、副总经理，并于2019年8月接替徐某担任法定代表人，后徐某将存储有上述技术信息等资料的移动硬盘交给陆某昌。2020年6月，司某律受让徐某42%的股份，成为中工公司占股51$的隐名大股东。此后，司某律利用其网络管理员权限，不断向中工公司陆某昌提供汇科公司的经营信息等采取保密措施的资料。中工公司利用从汇科公司获取的上述载有技术信息等内容的秘密资料后，生产并向汇科公司客户销售与汇科公司窑炉设备高度近似产品，给汇科公司造成损失达人民币500余万元。法院认为，中工公司以贿赂等不正当手段获取权利人的商业秘密，陆某昌徐某系直接负责的主管人员，被告人司某律违反保密义务披露其所掌握的商业秘密，情节特别严重，均构
32、成侵犯In2000,LuXXchangjoinedHuike,andlaterservedastheafter-salesmanager;in2011,SiXXIujoinedHuikeasanetworkadministrator.LuXXchangandSiXXIusignedanon-disclosureandnon-competeagreementwithHuikerespectivelyaftertheyjoinedthecompany,andHuikepaideachofthemconfidentialityallowancesonamonthlybasis.WuxiZhonggo
33、ngThermalControlTechnologyCo.,Ltd.(hereinafterreferredtoasZhonggong)wasestablishedinMarch2017.Duetothelackoftechnicaltalents,ZhonggongconstantlyrecruitedtalentsfromHuikebyadvantageofhighsalaryorequitystakeafteritsinception.ThroughthemiddlemanLuXXchangtXuXX,thelegalrepresentativeofZhonggong1Contacted
34、SiXXIuandinducedhimwithbenefitstotakeadvantageofhispositiontoillegallyprovideZhonggongwithHuikessecretssuchasthedesigndrawingsofatmospherefurnace,ahigh-endelectronicmponent.Subsequently,SiXXIudecryptedanumberofdrawingscontainingtechnicalinformationandsubjecttoconfidentialitymeasuresintheserverofHuik
35、eandcopiedthemtoXuXX.Inreturn,XuXXpaidSiXXIuRMB80,000and2%sharesofZhonggongworthRMB80,000.Further,SiXXIuchargedXuXXRMB68,000asdecryptionfee.1.uXXchangjoinedZhonggongasthedeputyGMinFebruary2018afterleavingHuike1andsucceededXuXXasthelegalrepresentativeinAugust2019.Later1XuXXhandedoverthemobileharddisk
36、containingtheaforesaidtechnicalinformationandothermaterialstoLuXXchangInJune2020,SiXXIuacquired42%sharesinZhonggongfromXuXX,becomingadormantmajorityshareholderwith51%sharesinZhonggong-Afterthat,SiXXlucontinuouslyprovidedLuXXchangofZhonggongwithHuikesbusinessinformationandotherconfidentialinformation
37、bytakingadvantagingofhisauthoritiesasanetworkadministrator.ByusingtheaforesaidsecretscontainingtechnicalinformationobtainedfromHuike.ZhonggongproducedproductshighlysimilartoHuikeskilnequipmentandsoldthemtoHuikescustomers,whichcausedlossesofoverRMB5milliontoHuike.ThecourtheldthatZhonggongobtainedthet
38、radesecretsoftherightholderbyimpropermeanssuchasbribery,andthatLuXXchangandXuXXwerethedirectlyresponsiblepersons,andthedefendantSiXXIudisclosedthetradesecretsinhispossessioninseriousviolationofconfidentialityObIigations1Whichconstitutedaninfringementoftradesecrets.ZhonggongandSiXXIucommittedajointcr
39、ime.EachofLuXXchangtSiXXIUandXuXXplayedamajorroleinthecrime.TheywereallprincipalcriminalsandshallbegivenpunishmentsaccordingtoallcrimestheyCommitted-Accordingtothecircumstancesofthedefendantentitysandthedefendants,crimes,thejudgmentheldthatZhonggongcommittedthecrimeofinfringementontradesecretsandsha
40、llbefinedRMB4.5million;LuXXchang1SiXXIuandXuXXcommittedthecrimeofinfringementontradesecretsandshallbesentencedtoafineandafixed-termimprisonmentrangingfromthreeyearstothreeyearsandsixmonths(ThiscaseisprovidedbyJiangsuHighPeoplesCourtJiangsuPeoplesProcuratorateandJiangsuProvincialAdministrationforMark
41、etRegulation)/AnalysisandComment/ThiscaseisatypicalcasetowhichtheAmendment(Xl)totheCriminalLawapplies.TheAmendmentrevisedthecriteriafortheconvictionofthecrimeofinfringementontradesecrets,andmodifiedbringingsignificantlossestotheowneroftradesecretsinArticle219oftheCriminalLawtoseriousviolation.Howeve
42、r,therehasbeennojudicialinterpretationonhowtodetermine-seriousViOIatiOrrandespeciallyseriousviolation.Thejudgmentheldthatsignificantlossescausedtovictim(s)werestillanimportantfactortomeasuretheuseriousnessofacrimeofinfringementontradesecrets.Therefore,itwasdeterminedthatboththedefendantentityandthed
43、efendantscommittedacrimeofinfringementontradesecrets.andthatthedefendantentityshallbefinedRMB4.5million,andeachdefendantshallbesentencedtoafixed-termimprisonmentandafine.Moreover,thedefendantentityinfringedontheknow-howsandtradesecretsofthevictimentityincollusionwiththeemployeesofthevictimentity,whi
44、chnstittedaflagrantviolation.Thecourtsdecisionreflectsthedeterminationtocrackdownonintellectualpropertycrimes,whichisconducivetomaintainingafairmarketorderandinspiringtheenthusiasmforinnovationofmarketplayers.TheprocuratorialorganissuedtheSuggestionsfromProsecutorialOrgansfortheloopholesintheconfide
45、ntialitysystemofthevictimentity.Aftermakingrectificationasperthesuggestions,thevictimentitybecameademonstrationsiteforintellectualpropertyprotection.2CaseOfInfringementonCopyrightsofMascotnBingDwenDwennofOlympicWinterGamcsRelatedtoLYUXXIongctal.InFebruary,2022,thepublicsecurityofficersofYangzhoufoun
46、dthatsomeonewassellingtheOlympicWinterGamesMastBingDwenDwenseriesproductsinYangzhouandotherplacesthroughonlinechannelsatapricefarlowerthanthepriceofgenuineproductsontheofficialwebsite,whichwashighlysuspicious.Consequently,theynductedanimmediateinvestigation.Upontheinvestigation,itwasfoundthatanumber
47、ofsuspectsinYangzhouboughtcounterfeituBingDwenDwenproductsthroughZhaoXXinWuxiandsoldthemonline.ZhaoXXscounterfeitBingDwenDwenproductswerepurchasedfromLyuXXIongandZhuXXqianginZhejiang-Therewereahugenumberofproductsinvolvedinthiscase.OnFebruary10,2022,YangzhouPublicSecurityBureaufiledacaseforinvestiga
48、tion.OnMarch8,2022,theFood1DrugandEnvironmentCrimeInvestigationDetachmentunderYangzhouPublicSecurityBureauJnconjunctionwithseveralpolicedepartmentsandtheComprehensiveLawEnforcementDetachmentofCulturalMarketofYangzhouCity,dispatchedmorethan50lawenforcementofficerstoarrestthesuspectsinZhejiangandJiangsuSimuItaneousIyJnanefforttocrackdownonthewholeillegalindustrialchainofproducing-wholesaling-sellingcounterfeituBingDwenDwenseriesproducts.Theyarrested10suspectswhoproducedandsoldcounterfeitproducts,destroyed2densforproducingandprocessingcounterfeitproductsand3densforstoringandwholes
