亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx

上传人:李司机 文档编号:6874979 上传时间:2024-03-13 格式:DOCX 页数:75 大小:139.44KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共75页
亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共75页
亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共75页
亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共75页
亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共75页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《亚开行-为难以削减的部门提供过渡金融的方法综述(英)-2023.12_市场营销策划_重点报告2023.docx(75页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。

1、iADBInstitute.ADBIWorkingPaperSeriesANOVERVIEWOFAPPROACHESTOTRANSITIONFINANCEFORHARD-TO-ABATESECTORSSayuriShiraiNo.1423December2023AsianDevelopmentBankInstituteTheWorkingPaperseriesisacontinuationoftheformerlynamedDiscussionPaperseries;thenumberingofthepaperscontinuedwithoutinterruptionorchange.ADBs

2、workingpapersreflectinitialideasonatopicandarepostedonlinefordiscussion.Someworkingpapersmaydevelopintootherformsofpublication.Suggestedcitation:Shirai,S.2023.AnOverviewofApproachestoTransitionFinanceforHard-to-AbateSectors.ADBIWorkingPaper1423.Tokyo:AsianDevelopmentBankInstitute.Available:Pleasecon

3、tacttheauthorsforinformationaboutthispaper.Email:sshiraiadbi.orgAsianDevelopmentBankInstituteKasumigasekiBuilding,8thFloor3-2-5Kasumigaseki,Chiyoda-kuTokyo100-6008,JapanTel:+81-3-3593-5500Fax:+81-3-3593-5571URL:www.adbi.orgE-mail:infoadbi.org2023AsianDevelopmentBankInstituteAbstractClimatefinancehas

4、witnessedsignificantgrowthasaburgeoningfieldoflong-termfinancegloballyinrecentyears.However,ithasyettoreachthenecessaryscaleformobilizingsufficientfundstosupportthedecarbonizationeffortsofbusinesses.Thisshortfallispartlyattributedtoongoinginvestorsconcernsaboutgreenwashingrisk.Manyglobalcompanieshav

5、emadecommitmentstoachievethenet-zerotargetby20501butwithoutconsistentshort-andmedium-termtargets,comprehensivedataandprogressreport,anddetailedactionplans.WhiletheTaskForceonClimate-RelatedFinancialDisclosure(TCFD)recommendationshavecontributedtoadvancingdisclosureframeworks,thestandardizationofcorp

6、oratedisclosureshasnotmadesubstantialprogress.Furthermore,aseriesofinitiativessuchastheenvironmental,social,andgovernance(ESG)ratingsofferedbydataproviders,thecertificationofgreenorsustainability-linkedbondlabelsthroughsecond-partyopinions,aswellasvarioustaxonomiesforgreenactivitieshaveenhancedtrans

7、parencytosomeextentbuttheirdivergentapproacheshavehamperedclimatefinancefromexpandingfurther.Therecentefforttostandardizeclimate-relateddisclosuresbytheInternationalSustainabilityStandardsBoard(ISSB),whichwasestablishedbytheTrusteesoftheInternationalFinancialReportingStandards(IFRS)Foundation,isapos

8、itivedevelopment,butbroaderinitiativesarerequiredtopromoteclimatefinance.Inparticular,transitionfinanceinhard-to-abatesectors(suchassteel,chemicals,cement)remainsunderdeveloped,despitetheurgentneedtofinanciallysupporttheiremissions-reducingefforts.Thispaperprovidesanoverviewofvariousapproachestoward

9、transitionfinanceintendedtoenhancecredibilitywhileaddressingtheirchallenges.Keywords:transitionfinance,carbonbudget,hard-to-abatesectors,ISSBClimate-RelatedDisclosures,taxonomy,traffic-lightclassificationsystemJELClassification:G15,G32,Q01,Q54Contents1. INTRODUCTION11.1 WhatHamperstheFurtherProgress

10、ofClimateFinance?11.2 ISSBStandardsPromotingStandardizationofCorporateDisclosure31.3 RecentGrowingAttentionstoTransitionFinance31.4 RecentInitiativestoEnhanceTransitionFinance52. TRANSITIONFINANCEANDLABELINGAPPROACHESINCAPITALMARKETS.62.1 InternationalCapitalMarketsAssociation(ICMA),sTransitionFinan

11、ceFramework62.2 ClimateBondInitiative(CBI),sTransitionLabelandCertification92.3 GreenEquityCriteriaandClassificationInitiatedbytheWorldFederationofExchanges152.4 ChallengesRelatedtoLabelingFinancialInstrumentsandConclusionsofSection2173. PRACTICESTOPROMOTECREDIBLETRANSITIONPLANSforEmissions-Intensiv

12、ecompanies193.1 Science-BasedTargetInitiative(SBTi)Certification193.2 DevelopingSectoralDecarbonizationApproach(SDA)213.3 UsingEnvironmentalCommonPerformanceThresholdsProposedbytheIEA263.4 IndustryTechnologyRoadMapsforTransitionFinanceDevelopedbyJapan273.5 PreventingCarbon-IntensiveLock-InandStrande

13、dAssets303.6 ChallengesRelatedtoSector-BasedApproachesandConclusionsofSection3314. TAXONOMIESFORTRANSITIONACTIVITIESINHARD-TO-ABATESECTORS.324.1 EU,sTaxonomyandTransitionFinance324.2 SingaporesTaxonomyProposalandTraffic-LightClassificationSystem384.3 ASEANTaxonomyandaTraffic-LightSystem474.4 Challen

14、gesRelatedtoTransitionActivitiesUndertheTaxonomiesandConclusionsofSection4525. TRANSITIONFINANCEFROMTHEPERSPECTIVEOFFINANCIALINSTITUTIONS545.1 DefiningTransitionFinanceandSegmentationofPortfolios545.2 AttributesofFourTransitionFinancingStrategies565.3 PromotingDecarbonizationContributionCalculation6

15、05.4 ChallengesRelatedtoDecarbonizingFinancedEmissions626. SUMMARIESANDCHALLENGES63REFERENCES691. INTRODUCTIONTheglobalcommunityneedstoexpeditethetransitionoftheeconomytoalignwiththeParisAgreementgoals,whichaimtolimittheincreaseintheglobalaveragetemperaturetowellbelow2orstrivetoachievealimitof1.5rel

16、ativetopre-industriallevels.Achievingthesegoalsnecessitatesgovernmentandcompaniestosignificantlyintensifytheireffortsinreducinggreenhousegas(GHG)emissions.Meanwhile,itisimportantforinvestorsandfinancialinstitutionstosupporttheseeffortsbyprovidingthenecessaryfinancingtosupporttheseendeavors.Climatefi

17、nanceisanemergingsectoroflong-termfinanceglobally.Itenablesgovernmentsandcompaniestosecurefundingfortheexpansionofeco-friendlyinitiativesandprojectsthroughtheissuanceofgreenorsustainability-linkedbonds(andloans).Greenbondsrepresentdebtinstrumentsinwhichtheproceedsareearmarkedforgreenprojectsandactiv

18、ities,knownasuse-of-proceedsbonds.Sustainability-Iinkedbondswithagreenfocusadjustfinancingtermscontingentontheachievementofpredefinedperformanceindicators,suchasreductionsinGHGemissions.Despitesignificantgrowth,climatefinancehasnotreacheditsfullpotentialtoattractadequateinvestmentsforsupportinggloba

19、ldecarbonizationandlow-carboncorporateactivities.Publicandprivatefinanceflowsforfossilfuelsremaingreaterthanthoseforclimateadaptationandmitigation.Thelatterfinancialflowsmustexpandsubstantiallybyafactorofthreetosixtimesgreaterthancurrentlevelsinordertolimitglobalwarmingto2or1.5oC(IPCC2023).Theprimar

20、yobstacleforpreventingfurtherexpansionofclimatefinanceliesinlimitedcorporatedisclosureandassociatedinvestors*concernsaboutgreenwashingrisk.Greenwashingarisesfromcorporatepracticesthatexaggeratetheirgreeninitiativesandprojectswithoutmakingmeaningfulemissionsreductions.1.1 WhatHamperstheFurtherProgres

21、sofClimateFinance?Severalfactorshavecontributedtotheunderdevelopmentofclimatefinance.First,manylargecompanieshavepledgedtoachievenet-zeroemissionsby2050orearlier,butwithoutdisclosingconsistentshort-andmedium-termtargets,whichdirectlyimpacttheirongoingbusinessoperations.Criticalbasicdata,suchasGHGemi

22、ssions一includingScope1(directemissions),Scope2(indirectemissionslikepurchasedelectricity),andScope3(emissionsfromsuppliersandusers)aswellasprogresstowardlong-termnet-zeroemissiontargetsareofteninadequate.Despiteincreasingcallsfrominvestorsandotherstakeholders,moreover,companies,disclosureregardingcr

23、edibleactionplansencompassingoperationalandcapitalexpendituresandsupplierengagement,aswellastheemissionsreductionpathtowardnet-zeroemissiontargets,areinsufficient.Second,therecommendationsforvoluntarycorporatedisclosuremadebytheTaskForceonClimate-RelatedFinancialDisclosure(TCFD)in2017anditsrevisedve

24、rsionin2019havepartiallycontributedtopromotingdisclosurestandardization.Forinstance,theTCFDrecommendationshaveadvocatedforaframeworkbasedonfourpillars:governance,strategy,riskmanagement,andmetricsandindicators.However,evenwiththesefourpillarsinplace,thedisclosureofGHGemissionsdata,emissiontargets,an

25、dcredibleactionplansremainssignificantlylacking.Consequently,thereexistsawidevariationindisclosureandreportingpracticesamongcompanies,makingcross-companycomparisonsextremelychallenging.Inaddition,TCFDrecommendationshavenotbeenadoptedwidelyinsomeregionsincludingSoutheastAsia.InadditiontotheTCFDrecomm

26、endations,numerousinfluentialclimate-relatedvoluntarydisclosureandreportingguidelinesandframeworkshavebeendevelopedfromvariousprivatesectororganizationsandinitiativessuchastheClimateDisclosureStandardsBoard(CDSB),sFrameworkforreportingenvironmentalandclimatechangeinformation,theValueReportingFoundat

27、ionsIntegratedReportingFramework,industry-specificSustainabilityAccountingStandardsBoard(SASB)Standards,theWorldEconomicForumsStakeholderCapitalismMetrics,andGlobalReportingInitiative(GRI),sSustainabilityReportingStandards.Whilethesedisclosureframeworkshaveintendedtoincreasetransparencyforinvestors,

28、theirdiverseapproacheshavefurthercontributedtocomplexityanddiversedisclosurepractices.Companiestendtoflexiblypicktheirpreferredreportingframeworksandonlydisclosepartoftheirreportingrequirements.Third,manyinvestorsrelyonenvironment,social,andgovernance(ESG)ratingsassignedtoeach,mostlylargelisted,comp

29、any,whichareprovidedbydozensofglobaldataproviders.ConcernsremainamongfinancialregulatorsduetothelimitedconsistencyamongESGratingsforthesamecompanyofferedbydifferentESGdataproviders,andevenwithineachsegmentofE,S,andG.ThisissuewasraisedbytheInternationalOrganizationofSecuritiesCommissions(IOSCO)in2021

30、(IOSCO2021).Consequently,investorsmightmakevaryinginvestmentdecisionsdependingonthedatasetpurchasedfromaparticulardataprovider.Whilelargeinvestorsorassetmanagementcompaniescanaddressthisissuebypurchasingdatafrommultipleproviders,smallerinvestorsareunabletodosoduetothehighdatasubscriptioncosts.Thesub

31、stantialdiscrepanciesamongtheratingsareprimarilyaresultofselectingdiverseindicatorsandallocatingthevaryingweightstoeachindicator.Furthermore,ESGdataprovidersoftenmakeestimatesformissingdatausingvariousmethodologies.Asaresult,divergencesamongtheseratingstendtobemoresignificantthantherelativelyconsist

32、entcreditratingsprovidedtobondissuersbyafewwell-establishedratingagencies.Thesmallerdifferencesincreditratingscanbeattributedtotherelativeeasinessofestimatingcreditworthiness,aspastreliablecreditdataandinformationaboutdefaulteventsonvariouscompaniesarereadilyavailable.Incontrast,forESGratings,datapr

33、ovidershavemoreflexibilitytoselectawiderangeofindicators,partlybecausecomprehensive,standardizedcorporatedisclosureonclimateaccountingislacking.Moreover,dataonhistoricalclimateeventremainlimited,particularlysincemostclimaterisks(includingphysicalandtransitionrisks)areexpectedtointensifynonlinearlyin

34、thefuture.Fourth,someinvestorsplaceapremiumondatareliability(suchasGHGemissionsdataandotherenvironmentalindicators)verifiedbyindependentverifiersforcompany-discloseddata.However,duetotheabsenceofstandardizeddisclosure,dataverificationmaynotnecessarilyfacilitatecross-companycomparisons.Furthermore,ma

35、nygreen,sustainabilitybonds,andsustainability-linkedbondsareissuedwithsecond-partyopinionscertifyingthatissuersdisclosureandobjectivesadheretospecificguidelinesandstandardsestablishedbycertainorganizations,suchastheInternationalCapitalMarketsAssociation(ICMA)andtheClimateBondInitiative(CBI).However,

36、theirapproachesarequitedivergentintermsofdisclosurerequirements.GiventhatICMA,sguidelinesaremostlybasedonrecommendationsratherthanrequirements,theremaybesomediscretionamongindependentverifierswithregardtotheextentofthoserecommendationsbeingadequatelytakenintoaccountintheprocessofproducingsecond-part

37、yopinions.ThedivergenttreatmentsonthedisclosureofGHGemissionsdata,net-zeroemissionstargetand1.5pathway,anddetailedactionplansmayleadtolabeledbondswithdifferentqualities.Moreover,theactualimpactofsuchlabeledbondissuances,suchasactualemissionsreduction,remainsunclearduetolimitedcorporatedisclosure.1.2

38、 ISSBStandardsPromotingStandardizationofCorporateDisclosureAsignificantandirreversibletrendistheincreasingmomentumtowardstandardizingclimate-relatedcorporatedisclosure,especiallysincetheInternationalSustainabilityStandardsBoard(ISSB)wasestablishedbytheTrusteesoftheInternationalFinancialReportingStan

39、dards(IFRS)Foundationin2021.TheISSBreleasedtheClimate-RelatedDisclosures(IFRSS2)inconjunctionwiththeGeneralRequirementforDisclosureofSustainability-RelatedFinancialInformation(IFRSS1)inJune2023(ISSB2023a,2023b).TheIFRSS1andS2arescheduledtobecomeeffectiveforannualreportingperiodsbeginninginJanuary202

40、4,withreportingtocommencein2025.ThesestandardsweredevelopedprimarilybyincorporatingtheTCFDrecommendationsandintegratingthemwiththeGHGProtocol,aswellassomeexistingdisclosureframeworksprovidedbyorganizationssuchastheCDSB,theValueReportingFoundation,theSASB,andtheWorldEconomicForum.TheISSBwasestablishe

41、dbytheIFRSFoundationin2021inresponsetostronginvestordemandforthedevelopmentofglobalstandardsthatcanserveasabaselineforcomprehensivecorporatesustainabilitydisclosures,meetingtheinformationneedsofinvestorsandotherstakeholders,whileensuringcompatibilitywithvariousexistingdisclosureandreportingframework

42、s.IFRSS2playacrucialroleinadvancingcarbonaccounting,measuringGHGemissionswithafocusonScope3emissions,andsettingemissionstargets,essentialformonitoringprogressinemissionsreductionandtheeffectivenessofcorporateactions(Shirai2023b).SinceISSBdisclosureframeworksreceivedsupportfromtheG7,theG20,IOSCO,andt

43、heFinancialStabilityBoard(FSB),manycountriesandregionsareexpectedtomandateIFRSS1andS2withintheirjurisdictions.OnenotableissuerelatedtoIFRSS2,however,istheabsenceofarequirementforalong-termnet-zeroemissiontarget.Giventhecriticalimportanceofachievingnet-zeroemissionsbyaround2050orearlierforcountriesan

44、dmajorcompanies,itisdesirableforeachcountrytomandatelong-termnet-zerotargets,alongwithISSBdisclosurerequirements,startingwithlargepubliclylistedcompaniesinaphasedmanner.However,itisimportanttonotethatmakingIFRSS2mandatory,whileprovidinganessentialsteptowarddisclosurestandardization,isnotthesolesolut

45、ionforscalingupclimateandsustainablefinance.1.3 RecentGrowingAttentionstoTransitionFinanceInadditiontodrivingcorporateclimate-relateddisclosurebasedonISSB,sIFRSS1andS2andpromotingnet-zerotargetsforallsectorsandlargecompanies,itisimperativetoshedlightontransitionfinance,whichisoneofthemostchallenging

46、,butunderdevelopedaspectsofclimatefinance.Inrecentyears,therehasbeenagrowingemphasisonincreasingfinancingforcompaniesoperatinginhard-to-abatesectors,suchasironandsteel,cement,basicchemicals,andaviation(aswellaselectricitygenerationfromfossilfuels),tosupporttheirtransitioneffortstowardnetzero.Sofar,t

47、ransitionfinancehasbeenlaggingbehindtherelativepopularityofgreen,sustainability,andsustainability-linkedbondsglobally.Ithasnotprovidedsufficientfinanceintransitioningemissions-intensivecompaniestowardsthelevelrequiredtoachievepracticalnet-zeroemissions.Thisreflectsthefactthatsomeinvestorsassociatetr

48、ansitionfinancewithgreenwashingfinance.Otherinvestorshavebeencautiousaboutfinancingemissions-intensivecompaniesduetothelackofcleardefinitionsandcriteriafordeterminingfinancingdecisions.TheOrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)IndustrySurveyonTransitionFinancerevealedthatmorethan60%o

49、finvestorswerehesitanttoprovidetransitionfinance,eitheringeneralorforspecificregions,duetoinadequateclarityonhowtoassesscrediblecorporatealignmentwithapathwaythatalignswiththeParisAgreementsgoals(OECD2022).Oneprimaryreasonforthiscautionisthattransitionbondsorsustainability-linkedbondsissuedbythesecompaniesmaynotnecessarilyresultinsubstantialreductionsinGHGemissionsforthecompanyasawholeoritse

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 生活休闲 > 在线阅读


备案号:宁ICP备2025010119号-1

经营许可证:宁B2-20210002

宁公网安备 64010402000987号