《Richard M. Nixon quot;Checke.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Richard M. Nixon quot;Checke.doc（36页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、-范文最新推荐- Richard M. Nixon: "Checke richard m. nixon: “checkers”my fellow americans, i come before you tonight as a candidate for the vice presidency and as a man whose honesty and integrity has been questioned. now, the usual political thing to do when charges are made against you is to either
2、ignore them or to deny them without giving details. i believe weve had enough of that in the united states, particularly with the present administration in washington, d.c. to me the office of the vice presidency of the united states is a great office, and i feel that the people have got to have con
3、fidence in the integrity of the men who run for that office and who might obtain it. i have a theory, too, that the best and only answer to a smear or to an honest misunderstanding of the facts is to tell the truth. and thats why i am here tonight. i want to tell you my side of the case. im sure tha
4、t you have read the charge, and youve heard it, that i, senator nixon, took $18,000 from a group of my supporters. now, was that wrong? and let me say that it was wrong. i am saying it, incidentally, that it was wrong, just not illegal, because it isnt a question of whether it was legal or illegal,
5、that isnt enough. the question is, was it morally wrong? i say that it was morally wrong - if any of that $18,000 went to senator nixon, for my personal use. i say that it was morally wrong if it was secretly given, and secretly handled. and i say that it was morally wrong if any of the contributors
6、 got special favors for the contributions that they made. and now to answer those questions let me say this: not one cent of the $18,000 or any other money of that type ever went to me for my personal use. every penny of it was used to pay for political expenses that i did not think should be charge
7、d to the taxpayers of the united states. it was not a secret fund. as a matter of fact, when i was on “meet the press”- some of you may have seen it last sunday - peter edson came up to me after the program, and he said, “dick, what about is fund we hear about?” and i said, “well, there is no secret
8、 about it. go out and see dana smith who was the administrator of the fund.” and i gave him edson his smiths address. and i said you will find that the purpose of the fund simply was to defray political expenses that i did not feel should be charged to the government. and third, let me point out - a
9、nd i want to make this particularly clear - that no contributor to this fund, no contributor to any of my campaigns, has ever received any consideration that he would not have received as an ordinary constituent. i just dont believe in that, and i can say that never, while i have been in the senate
10、of the united states, as far as the people that contributed to this fund are concerned, have i made a telephone call for them to an agency, or have i gone down to an agency on their behalf. and the records will show that, the records which are in the hands of the administration. well, then, some of
11、you will say, and rightly, “well, what did you use the fund for, senator? why did you have to have it?” let me tell you in just a word how a senate office operates. first of all, a senator gets $15,000 a year in salary. he gets enough money to pay for one trip a year, a round trip, that is, for hims
12、elf, and his family between his home and washington, d.c. and then he gets an allowance to handle the people that work in his office to handle his mail. and the allowance for my state of california, is enough to hire 13 people. and let me say, incidentally, that that allowance is not paid to the sen
13、ator. it is paid directly to the individuals that the senator puts on his pay roll. but all of these people and all of these allowances are for strictly official business; business, for example, when a constituent writes in and wants you to go down to the veterans administration and get some informa
14、tion about his gi policy - items of that type, for example. but there are other expenses that are not covered by the government. and i think i can best discuss those expenses by asking you some questions. do you think that when i or any other senator makes a political speech, has it printed, should
15、charge the printing of that speech and the mailing of that speech to the taxpayers? do you think, for example, when i or any other senator makes a trip to his home state to make a purely political speech that the cost of that trip should be charged to the taxpayers? do you think when a senator makes
16、 political broadcasts or political television broadcasts, radio or television, that the expense of those broadcasts should be charged to the taxpayers? well i know what your answer is. its the same answer that audiences give me whenever i discuss this particular problem: the answer is no. the taxpay
17、ers shouldnt be required to finance items which are not official business but which are primarily political business. well, then the question arises, you say, “well, how do you pay for these and how can you do it legally?” and there are several ways that it can be done, incidentally, and it is done
18、legally in the united states senate and in the congress. the first way is to be a rich man. i dont happen to be a rich man, so i couldnt use that one. another way that is used is to put your wife on the pay roll. let me say, incidentally, that my opponent, my opposite number for the vice presidency
19、on the democratic ticket, does have his wife on the pay roll and has had her on his pay roll for the past ten years. now let me just say this: that his business, and im not critical of him for doing that. you will have to pass judgment on that particular point. but i have never done that for this re
20、ason: i have found that there are so many deserving stenographers and secretaries in washington that needed the work that i just didnt feel it was right to put my wife on the pay roll. my wifes sitting over here. she is a wonderful stenographer. she used to teach stenography and she used to teach sh
21、orthand in high school. that was when i met her. and i can tell you folks that shes worked many hours at night and many hours on saturdays and sundays in my office, and shes done a fine job, and i am proud to say tonight that in the six years i have been in the house and the senate of the united sta
22、tes, pat nixon has never been on the government pay roll. what are other ways that these finances can be taken care of? some who are lawyers, and i happen to be a lawyer, continue to practice law, but i havent been able to do that. i am so far away from california that i have been so busy with my se
23、natorial work that i have not engaged in any legal practice, and, also, as far as law practice is concerned, it seemed to me that the relationship between an attorney and the client was so personal that you couldnt possibly represent a man as an attorney and then have an unbiased view when he presen
24、ted his case to you in the event that he had one before government. and so i felt that the best way to handle these necessary political expenses of getting my message to the american people and the speeches i made - the speeches i had printed for the most part concerned this one message of exposing
25、this administration, the communism in it, the corruption in it - the only way that i could do that was to accept the aid which people in my home state of california, who contributed to my campaign and who continued to make these contributions after i was elected, were glad to make. and let me say i
26、am proud of the fact that not one of them has ever asked me for a special favor. i am proud of the fact that not one of them has ever asked me to vote on a bill other than my own conscience would dictate. and i am proud of the fact that the taxpayers by subterfuge or otherwise have never paid one di
27、me for expenses which i thought were political and shouldnt be charged to the taxpayers. let me say, incidentally, that some of you may say, “well, that is all right, senator, thats your explanation, but have you got any proof?” and id like to tell you this evening that just an hour ago we received
28、an independent audit of this entire fund. i suggested to governor sherman adams, who is the chief of staff of the dwight eisenhower campaign, that an independent audit and legal report be obtained, and i have that audit in my hands. its an audit made by the price waterhouse & co. firm, and the l
29、egal opinion by gibson, dunn, & crutcher, lawyers in los angeles, the biggest law firm, and incidentally, one of the best ones in los angeles. i am proud to be able to report to you tonight that this audit and this legal opinion is being forwarded to general eisenhower. and id like to read to yo
30、u the opinion that was prepared by gibson, dunn, & crutcher, and based on all the pertinent laws and statutes, together with the audit report prepared by the certified public accountants: “it is our conclusion that senator nixon did not obtain any financial gain from the collection and disbursem
31、ent of the fund by dana smith; that senator nixon did not violate any federal or state law by reason of the operation of the fund; and that neither the portion of the fund paid by dana smith directly to third persons, nor the portion paid to senator nixon, to reimburse him for designated office expe
32、nses, constituted income to the senator which was either reportable or taxable as income under applicable tax laws.” (signed) gibson, dunn, & crutcher, by elmo h. conley now that, my friends, is not nixon speaking, but thats an independent audit which was requested, because i want the american p
33、eople to know all the facts, and i am not afraid of having independent people go in and check the facts, and that is exactly what they did. but then i realized that there are still some who may say, and rightly so - and let me say that i recognize that some will continue to smear regardless of what
34、the truth may be - but that there has been understandably, some honest misunderstanding on this matter, and there are some that will say, “well, maybe you were able, senator, to fake the thing. how can we believe what you say? after all, is there a possibility that maybe you got some sums in cash? i
35、s there a possibility that you might have feathered your own nest?” and so now, that i am going to do - and incidentally this is unprecedented in the history of american politics - i am going at this time to give to this television and radio audience, a complete financial history, everything ive ear
36、ned, everything ive spent, everything i own. and i want you to know the facts. ill have to start early. i was born in 1913. our family was one of modest circumstances, and most of my early life was spent in a store out in east whittier. it was a grocery store, one of those family enterprises. the on
37、ly reason we were able to make it go was because my mother and dad had five boys, and we all worked in the store. i worked my way through college, and, to a great extent, through law school. and then in 1940, probably the best thing that ever happened to me happened. i married pat who is sitting ove
38、r here. we had a rather difficult time after we were married, like so many of the young couples who may be listening to us. i practiced law. she continued to teach school. now, what have i earned since i went into politics? well, here it is. ive jotted it down. let me read the notes. first of all, i
39、 have had my salary as a congressman and as a senator. second, i have received a total in this past six years of $1,600 from estates which were in my law firm at the time that i severed my connection with it. and, incidentally, as i said before, i have not engaged in any legal practice and have not
40、accepted any fees from business that came into the firm after i went into politics. i have made an average of approximately $1,500 a year from nonpolitical speaking engagements and lectures. and then, fortunately, we have inherited little money. pat sold her interest in her fathers estate for $3,000
41、, and i inherited $1,500 from my grandfather. we lived rather modestly. for four years we lived in an apartment in parkfairfax, in alexandria virginia. the rent was $80.00 a month. and we saved for the time that we could buy a house. now, that was what we took in. what did we do with this money? wha
42、t do we have today to show for it? this will surprise you because it is so little, i suppose, as standards generally go of people in public life. well, thats about it. thats what we have. and thats what we owe. it isnt very much. but pat and i have the satisfaction that every dime that weve got is h
43、onestly ours. i should say this, that pat doesnt have a mink coat. but she does have a respectable republican cloth coat, and i always tell her shed look good in anything. one other thing i probably should tell you, because if i dont theyll probably be saying this about me, too. we did get something
44、, a gift, after the election. a man down in texas heard pat on the radio mention the fact that our two youngsters would like to have a dog. and believe it or not, the day before we left on this campaign trip we got a message from union station in baltimore, saying they had a package for us. we went
45、down to get it. you know what it was? it was a little cocker spaniel dog, in a crate that he had sent all the way from texas, black and white, spotted, and our little girl tricia, the six year old, named it checkers. and you know, the kids, like all kids, love the dog, and i just want to say this, r
46、ight now, that regardless of what they say about it, were gonna keep it. it isnt easy to come before a nationwide audience and bare your life, as ive done. but i want to say some things before i conclude, that i think most of you will agree on. mr. mitchell, the chairman of the democratic national c
47、ommittee, made this statement that if a man couldnt afford to be in the united states senate, he shouldnt run for the senate. and i just want to make my position clear. i dont agree with mr. mitchell when he says that only a rich man should serve his government in the united states senate or in the
48、congress. i dont believe that represents the thinking of the democratic party, and i know that it doesnt represent the thinking of the republican party. i believe that its fine that a man like governor stevenson, who inherited a fortune from his father, can run for president. but i also feel that its essential in this country of ours that a man of modest means can also run for president, because, you know, remember abraham lincoln, you remember what he said: “god must have loved the common people - he made so many of them.” and now im going to suggest some courses of conduct. first of all, y
