Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt

上传人:小飞机 文档编号:3906511 上传时间:2023-03-26 格式:PPT 页数:20 大小:752.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt_第1页
第1页 / 共20页
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt_第2页
第2页 / 共20页
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt_第3页
第3页 / 共20页
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt_第4页
第4页 / 共20页
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt_第5页
第5页 / 共20页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - NSpine:腰椎椎管狭窄nspine课件.ppt(20页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。

1、September 5th 8th 2013Nottingham Conference Centre,United Kingdomwww.nspine.co.uk,Lumbar Spinal Stenosis(LSS)Conservative Management,Ellen HobbsPhysiotherapistSeptember 2013,What does the literature indicate?,Surgery is generally the gold standard.(Negrini et al 2010;Zaina et al 2012)Only a few stud

2、ies have compared surgical vs non-surgical treatment.(Negrini et al 2010)Evidence regarding conservative management is limited and vague.(Atlas and Delitto 2006;Birkmeyer et al 2002;Goren et al 2009;Tomkins 2010 cited in Zaina et al 2012)However.,What does the literature indicate?,Research non-speci

3、fic/no current standard for conservative care.Therefore do positive results truly support surgery?(Backstrom et al 2011)Long term effectiveness of surgery has been questioned.(Backstrom et al 2011;Fritz et al 1998)Patient selection for surgery is ill-defined.(Backstrom et al 2011)High risk and costl

4、y.(Fritz et al 1998),What does the literature indicate?,Conservative/non-invasive=recommended first line intervention.(Negrini et al 2010;Fritz et al 1998)The natural history of LSS is not necessarily a progressive decline.(Fritz et al 1998)Patients with mild to moderate symptoms of lumbar stenosis

5、have satisfactory outcomes following conservative management(Goren et al 2009),Proposed Conservative Adjuncts,Patient Education and Manual Therapy,Inform patientRationale forSelf management strategies(Backstrom et al 2011;Johnson et al 1991;Rademeyer 2003;Voet et al 2005)Manual TherapyUse as a compo

6、nent of LSS is associated with improvements in pain and disability(Reiman et al 2009;Zaina et al 2012;Goren et al 2009)Techniques used are varied/applied to different regions(Backstrom et al 2011)Choice of procedure less important than the introduction of movement through manual therapy.(Backstrom e

7、t al 2011),Exercise Prescription,Aerobic Training and Progressive strengthening:(supervised circuit/Spinal class/Home exercises)(Backstrom et al 2011;Goren et al 2009)Core Stability Exercise:Done with a flexion bias emphasizing pelvic control e.g.shoulder bridge(Backstrom et al 2011;Fritz et al 1998

8、)Flexibility:Overall stiffness=common LSS presentation.(Fritz et al 1998;Whitman et al 2003,2006;Creighton et al 2006;Murphy et al 2006 cited in Backstrom et al 2011;Zaina et al 2012).Limited evidence directing exercise dosage in patients with LSS.DO WE UNDERTREAT?(Backstrom et al 2011),Outcome Meas

9、ures,Multi-dimensionalObjective markers Patient Goals/FunctionRoland Morris/ODI/EQ5DVASTimed walk(15 minutes)Sit to stand,Considerations and Onward Referral,Relies on correct differential diagnosisDifficult due to similar coexisting symptoms(Fritz et al 1998)NUH 4-6 sessions.If no change in symptomo

10、logy the?onward referral.In reality there are no standard/set criteria for timeframes of conservative Mx,Summary,Patients with mild to moderate symptoms of lumbar stenosis may benefit from conservative management(Goren et al 2009)However:Few existing RCTs(4/178)that specifically examine and report o

11、n patient with LSS receiving conservative treatment.(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2001).Studies do not evaluate applications alone.(Goran et al 2009)Research fails to evaluate long term effectiveness of conservative management.(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2001).Lack of c

12、omparable patient groups and pre-treatment data for both surgical and conservatively managed patient groups(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2001).True comparisons are difficult as many patient treated conservatively end up having surgery.(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2001).,

13、Summary,However does this lack of evidence prove that these treatment are not effective?(Rockville 2001)Need to consider each individual patient and their symptomology when deciding conservative vs surgical.Need to establish set outcome measures for patient with LSS.,Appendix,Indications,Lower limb

14、pain Neurological symptoms exacerbated by walkingNeurogenic claudicationReduced walking capacities,Injection,Epidural steroid injections used increasingly to relieve symptoms.(Delport et al 2004;Campbell et al 2007 cited in Backstrom et al 2011)Low level evidence studies show some benefit in patient

15、s with spinal stenosis.One RCT indicates temporary relief for one month.Conclusions beyond three months cannot be made.(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2001).Systematic review concluded more strenuous studies need to be performed.(Nelemans et al 2005;Buenaventura et al 2009 cited in Backs

16、trom et al 2011).Often used in combination with physiotherapy.,Neurodynamics,Consider that pathoneurodynamics may be contributing to symptomology.Neurodynamic testing and reproduction of symptoms using differentiation may indicate neurodynamics treatment.Nerve glidingTreatment of mechanical interfac

17、e:Trigger point/acupunctureTaping to offload:Inhibitory across muscle fibres.Neural offloading:reduces nociceptor impulses,References,Atlas SJ,Delitto A:Spinal stenosis:surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.Clin Orthop Rel Res 2006,443 pp198-207Backstrom KM,Whitman JM,Flynn TW:Lumbar spinal stenosis

18、-diagnosis and management of the aging spine;Manual Therapy 2011,Vol 16 pp308-317.Birkmeyer NJO,Weinstein JM,Tosteson ANA,Skinner JS,Lurie JD,Deyo R,Wennberg JE:Design of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial(SPORT);Spine 2002,June 15;27(12):1361 1372.Fritz JM,Erhard RE,Vignovic M:Anonsurgical T

19、reatment Approach for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis:Physical Therapy 1997,Vol 9 pp962-973.,References,Fritz JM,Delitto A,Welch WC,Erhard,RE:Lumbar Spinal Stenosis:A Review of Current Concepts in Evaluation,Management,and Outcome Measurements.Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation 1998,Vol 79 pp 700-8.G

20、oren A,Yildiz O,Findikoglu,G,Ardic F:Efficacy of exercise and ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis:a prospective randomized controlled trial.Clinical Rehabilitation 2010,24 pp 623-631.Johnsson K,Daglas M,Stucki G,Katz N,Bayley J,Fossel A.Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.A comparison

21、 of surgically treated and untreated patients.Spine 1991:16:615-9,References,Negrini SZ,Zaina F,Romano M,Atanasio S,Fusco C,Trevisan C.Rehabilitation of lumbar spine disorders;an evidence-based clinical practice approach.De Lisas Physical 7 Rehabilitation-Principles and Practice 2010:837 82.Treatmen

22、t of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Summary,Evidence Report/Technology Assessment:Number 32.AHRQ Publication No.01-E047,March 2001.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,Rockville,MD.http:/www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/stenosum.htm.Rademeyer I.Manual Therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis;a compr

23、ehensive physical therapy approach.Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 2003;14:103-10,References,Reiman M,Harris J,Cleland J.Manual therapy interventions for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis:a systematic review.New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy 2009;37:17 28.Zaina,F,Tomkins-Lane C,Carragee E,Negrini:Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis(Protocal);The Cochrane Library 2012,Issue 12;pp 1-14.,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 生活休闲 > 在线阅读


备案号:宁ICP备20000045号-2

经营许可证:宁B2-20210002

宁公网安备 64010402000987号